DeepSeek lists 25 models and Inference.net 2. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does DeepSeek cost compare with Inference.net cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.45 for DeepSeek. The cheapest paid models are DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (batch) at $0.08 and Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06.
Is DeepSeek better than Inference.net?
It depends on the job: DeepSeek offers the broader line-up (25 models vs 2), Inference.net the lower typical price, DeepSeek the longest context (1.0M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, DeepSeek or Inference.net?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek lists 25 models and Inference.net lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
DeepSeek: DeepSeek's longest is DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 at 1.0M tokens; Inference.net's is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K.