Deep Cogito lists 1 models and Inference.net 2. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Deep Cogito cost compare with Inference.net cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $1.25 for Deep Cogito. The cheapest paid models are Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B at $1.25 and Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06.
Is Deep Cogito better than Inference.net?
It depends on the job: Inference.net offers the broader line-up (1 models vs 2), Inference.net the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Deep Cogito or Inference.net?
Inference.net: Deep Cogito lists 1 models and Inference.net lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Deep Cogito's longest is Deep Cogito: Cogito v2.1 671B at 128K tokens; Inference.net's is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K.
Do Deep Cogito or Inference.net offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Deep Cogito: 0 of 1 models accept images. Inference.net: 0 of 2.