Baidu lists 5 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $0.25 for Baidu. The cheapest paid models are Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B at $0.12 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Baidu better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Baidu offers the broader line-up (5 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price, Scaledown the longest context (1M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Baidu or Scaledown?
Baidu: Baidu lists 5 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Scaledown: Baidu's longest is Baidu: ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking at 131K tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.
Do Baidu or Scaledown offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Baidu: 2 of 5 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.