Anthropic lists 40 models and Scaledown 2. Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model ($0.03 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Anthropic cost compare with Scaledown cost?
Scaledown is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $6.00 for Anthropic. The cheapest paid models are Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) at $0.10 and ScaleDown: Extract at $0.03.
Is Anthropic better than Scaledown?
It depends on the job: Anthropic offers the broader line-up (40 models vs 2), Scaledown the lower typical price. The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Anthropic or Scaledown?
Anthropic: Anthropic lists 40 models and Scaledown lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
It is a tie: Anthropic's longest is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 at 1M tokens; Scaledown's is ScaleDown: Extract at 1M.
Do Anthropic or Scaledown offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Anthropic: 40 of 40 models accept images. Scaledown: 2 of 2.