Anthropic lists 40 models and Inference.net 2. Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model ($0.08 per 1M tokens median). Below: line-up, price tiers, the cheapest model for each capability, and what each costs for five real workloads.
For each workload: the cheapest model from each provider that can actually do it (fits the context window; tool calling required for the agent), and its monthly cost at list price.
How does Anthropic cost compare with Inference.net cost?
Inference.net is cheaper on a typical model: a median of $0.08 per 1M tokens (3:1 input/output) against $6.00 for Anthropic. The cheapest paid models are Anthropic: Claude Haiku 5.5 (batch) at $0.10 and Inference.net: Schematron V2 Turbo at $0.06.
Is Anthropic better than Inference.net?
It depends on the job: Anthropic offers the broader line-up (40 models vs 2), Inference.net the lower typical price, Anthropic the longest context (1M tokens). The workload table above shows which wins for chat, RAG, agents, batch jobs and long documents.
Which has more models, Anthropic or Inference.net?
Anthropic: Anthropic lists 40 models and Inference.net lists 2.
Which provider has the longest context window?
Anthropic: Anthropic's longest is Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 at 1M tokens; Inference.net's is Inference.net: Schematron V2 Small at 128K.
Do Anthropic or Inference.net offer free models?
Neither lists a free model; both are pay-per-token.
Which provider has models that can read images?
Anthropic: 40 of 40 models accept images. Inference.net: 0 of 2.