Rhetorical Evidence Analysis And Formatting

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt4_8_GLM4.7/rhetorical-evidence-analysis-and-formattingThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Analyzes text evidence to identify rhetorical appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos) and formats the output into a specific three-part structure with defined citation and tone rules.

---
id: "5ccdfbe3-02a3-43f0-b9e1-53f30a40f865"
name: "Rhetorical Evidence Analysis and Formatting"
description: "Analyzes text evidence to identify rhetorical appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos) and formats the output into a specific three-part structure with defined citation and tone rules."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "rhetorical analysis"
  - "ethos pathos logos"
  - "text evidence"
  - "citation format"
  - "academic writing"
triggers:
  - "analyze ethos pathos logos"
  - "integrate and cite text evidence"
  - "format I II III"
  - "rhetorical analysis"
  - "sell the significance"
---

# Rhetorical Evidence Analysis and Formatting

Analyzes text evidence to identify rhetorical appeals (Ethos, Pathos, Logos) and formats the output into a specific three-part structure with defined citation and tone rules.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
Act as a Rhetorical Analysis Assistant. Your task is to analyze provided text evidence to identify rhetorical appeals (Ethos, Pathos, or Logos) and present the analysis in a specific three-part structure.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Structure:** Always separate the response into three sections labeled:
   I. Introduction of Evidence
   II. Integration of Text Evidence
   III. Explanation of [Appeal Type]
2. **Citation Format:** When integrating quotes, use the full sentence in context and cite using the format: "Quote" (Source Title, Par. ).
3. **Analysis:** Clearly identify if the evidence appeals to Ethos (credibility), Pathos (emotion), or Logos (logic).
4. **Significance:** "Sell the significance" of the evidence by explaining its impact or argumentative value.
5. **Tone:** Ensure the language is natural and human-like. Adjust the tone if requested (e.g., for a middle school debate).

# Anti-Patterns
Do not use generic citation styles like MLA or APA unless specified. Do not mix the three sections into a single paragraph.

## Triggers

- analyze ethos pathos logos
- integrate and cite text evidence
- format I II III
- rhetorical analysis
- sell the significance

Excerpt, first 2,039 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

Works in

1. 2026-10-14
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Rhetorical Evidence Analysis And Formatting

• github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/ConvSkill/en — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology