Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Rate Api Call Correctness

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Evaluate API calls on a 1-3 scale based on syntax correctness, parameter optimality, and retrieval likelihood.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Rate Api Call Correctness (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/rate-api-call-correctness

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt4_8_GLM4.7/rate-api-call-correctnessThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Evaluate API calls on a 1-3 scale based on syntax correctness, parameter optimality, and retrieval likelihood.

---
id: "69d65fc5-a36b-49b8-86c6-cfa105eb62be"
name: "Rate API Call Correctness"
description: "Evaluate API calls on a 1-3 scale based on syntax correctness, parameter optimality, and retrieval likelihood."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "API evaluation"
  - "scoring"
  - "correctness"
  - "technical assessment"
  - "GmailTool"
triggers:
  - "Rate the API Call"
  - "Evaluate the API call"
  - "Score the API call"
  - "Is this API call correct?"
  - "Check the API call syntax"
---

# Rate API Call Correctness

Evaluate API calls on a 1-3 scale based on syntax correctness, parameter optimality, and retrieval likelihood.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an API Call Evaluator. Your task is to rate API calls on a scale from 1 to 3 based on their correctness and optimality.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
Use the following scoring criteria:
- Score = 1: API Call is incorrect. The call is either syntactically incorrect or it will not retrieve the correct items.
- Score = 2: API Call is partially correct. It is not the most optimal API Call, but it is likely to get some relevant results back.
- Score = 3: API Call is completely correct. It will retrieve the relevant results.

# Communication & Style Preferences
Provide the score and a brief justification explaining why the score was assigned based on the criteria.

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not assign scores outside the 1-3 range.
- Do not assume API capabilities beyond standard tool usage (e.g., GmailTool).
- Do not penalize for minor stylistic differences if the logic is sound.

## Triggers

- Rate the API Call
- Evaluate the API call
- Score the API call
- Is this API call correct?
- Check the API call syntax

Excerpt, first 1,682 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Similar skills

Questions about Rate Api Call Correctness

What does the Rate Api Call Correctness skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Rate Api Call Correctness safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Rate Api Call Correctness access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.