Agent skill · Audited from source
ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程
skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 在结构化短程叙事干预中,于每次咨询前标准化施测Outcome Rating Scale(ORS),以第1次得分为基线,逐次追踪4维度(个人主观症状、人际、社会角色、整体)的微小变化,为干预节奏与焦点调整提供客观、可绘图的量化依据,并在≥3分提升时触发具身化、叙事锚定的正向反馈。
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/ors
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/后现代主义/二级技能/ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程The exact folder we audited
- LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: 在结构化短程叙事干预中,于每次咨询前标准化施测Outcome Rating Scale(ORS),以第1次得分为基线,逐次追踪4维度(个人主观症状、人际、社会角色、整体)的微小变化,为干预节奏与焦点调整提供客观、可绘图的量化依据,并在≥3分提升时触发具身化、叙事锚定的正向反馈。
---
id: "1b293ec0-1978-5eb6-be5d-8c08f77b0f76"
name: "ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程"
description: "在结构化短程叙事干预中,于每次咨询前标准化施测Outcome Rating Scale(ORS),以第1次得分为基线,逐次追踪4维度(个人主观症状、人际、社会角色、整体)的微小变化,为干预节奏与焦点调整提供客观、可绘图的量化依据,并在≥3分提升时触发具身化、叙事锚定的正向反馈。"
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "narrative therapy"
- "outcome monitoring"
- "visual analog scale"
- "brief assessment"
- "后现代主义"
- "profile:psychology::后现代主义"
- "axis:疗法"
triggers:
- "开展结构化短程叙事干预(≥4次)"
- "需向督导/团队或个案本人提供进展可视化证据"
- "个案具备基本视觉模拟量表理解与标记能力"
examples:
- input: "第1次干预前ORS总分=18(基线);第2次干预前标记后测量得22"
output: "反馈话术:'您这周总分提升了4分——尤其在“人际关系”这条线上进步明显(从5到8)。这让我想到上回您和舍友A那次‘明确而严肃’的对话,它是否也悄悄改变了您对自己关系能力的看法?'"
notes: "反馈须锚定具体条目变化,并自然衔接叙事干预中已识别的独特事件。"
- input: "第3次干预前ORS总分=21(较基线+3)"
output: "反馈话术:'这次总分又稳住了,而且“生活社交”这一项比上周还高了1分。您觉得最近哪些小行动可能悄悄支撑了这部分的变化?'"
notes: "采用开放式提问延续支线故事探索,不归因、不总结、不强化‘应该更好’的期待。"
---
# ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程
在结构化短程叙事干预中,于每次咨询前标准化施测Outcome Rating Scale(ORS),以第1次得分为基线,逐次追踪4维度(个人主观症状、人际、社会角色、整体)的微小变化,为干预节奏与焦点调整提供客观、可绘图的量化依据,并在≥3分提升时触发具身化、叙事锚定的正向反馈。
## Prompt
每次叙事干预开始前,向个案呈现4条目ORS视觉模拟量表(0–10 cm线段),清晰说明:'越往左代表近一周状态越差,越往右代表越好;请用笔在每条线上标记您当前的真实感受位置。' 使用直尺精确测量各条目标记点至左端距离(cm),取整数分(0–10),四条目总分即为本次ORS得分(0–40)。第1次得分自动设为基线;后续每次得分均与基线比较,记录差值。若第2次得分较基线提升≥3分,即时给予‘进展确认’反馈(如:'我注意到您这周在几个方面都有小幅但稳定的改善,特别是人际关系这一项——这和我们上次聚焦的沟通尝试有关联吗?')。
## Objective
将主观叙事进展与可量化功能指标动态耦合
## Applicable Signals
- 个案完成第1次叙事干预并进入第2次准备阶段
- 督导要求提供量化进展数据
- 个案主动询问'我有没有变好一点'
## Contraindications
- 个案存在严重读写或视知觉障碍
- 咨询为单次危机干预或非结构化支持
- ORS未获本地伦理审批或翻译验证
## Intervention Moves
- 视觉模拟量表引导与确认
- 直尺标准化计分
- 基线自动锚定与差值计算
- ≥3分变化触发结构化反馈
## Workflow Steps
- Step 1: 干预前5分钟发放ORS量表,口头说明评分规则;
- Step 2: 个案独立完成4条目标记;
- Step 3: 咨询师用直尺测量并记录各条目分值及总分;
- Step 4: 比对基线,判断是否达≥3分提升;
- Step 5: 若达标,执行'进展确认'反馈;若未达标,照常推进干预,不作解释性评论。
## Constraints
- 必须严格在每次干预开始前施测,不可回溯或补测;
- 不得修改ORS原始4维度(个人主观症状、人际、社会角色、整体);
- 不得将ORS分数用于诊断或终止咨询决策依据。
## Cautions
- 避免在个案情绪极度低落或急性危机时施测,以免加重无力感;
- 若个案反复在同一条目(如'整体生活状态')得0分,需在当次咨询中优先探询该维度的具体意涵,而非仅记录分数。
## Output Contract
- 生成7次连续ORS得分序列(含基线),输出可绘图的结构化数据表(时间点, 总分, 较基线差值),并在第2次得分≥基线+3时,触发一次具身化、关联叙事进程的正向反馈话术。
## Example Therapist Responses
### Example 1
- Client/Input: 第1次干预前ORS总分=18(基线);第2次干预前标记后测量得22
- Therapist/Output: 反馈话术:'您这周总分提升了4分——尤其在“人际关系”这条线上进步明显(从5到8)。这让我想到上回您和舍友A那次‘明确而严肃’的对话,它是否也悄悄改变了您对自己关系能力的看法?'
- Notes: 反馈须锚定具体条目变化,并自然衔接叙事干预中已识别的独特事件。
### Example 2
- Client/Input: 第3次干预前ORS总分=21(较基线+3)
- Therapist/Output: 反馈话术:'这次总分又稳住了,而且“生活社交”这一项比上周还高了1分。您觉得最近哪些小行动可能悄悄支撑了这部分的变化?'
- Notes: 采用开放式提问延续支线故事探索,不归因、不总结、不强化‘应该更好’的期待。
## Files
- `references/evidence.md`
- `references/evidence_manifest.json`
## Triggers
- 开展结构化短程叙事干预(≥4次)
- 需向督导/团队或个案本人提供进展可视化证据
- 个案具备基本视觉模拟量表理解与标记能力
## Examples
### Example 1
Input:
第1次干预前ORS总分=18(基线);第2次干预前标记后测量得22
Output:
反馈话术:'您这周总分提升了4分——尤其在“人际关系”这条线上进步明显(从5到8)。这让我想到上回您和舍友A那次‘明确而严肃’的对话,它是否也悄悄改变了您对自己关系能力的看法?'
Notes:
反馈须锚定具体条目变化,并自然衔接叙事干预中已识别的独特事件。
### Example 2
Input:
第3次干预前ORS总分=21(较基线+3)
Output:
反馈话术:'这次总分又稳住了,而且“生活社交”这一项比上周还高了1分。您觉得最近哪些小行动可能悄悄支撑了这部分的变化?'
Notes:
采用开放式提问延续支线故事探索,不归因、不总结、不强化‘应该更好’的期待。Excerpt, first 3,037 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
04e912cff54b
Similar skills
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Executes a 1-back test by comparing the current input to the immediately preceding input in a sequence, reporting the prior item and a match indicator.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Identifies the critical 20% of a given topic that yields 80% of the results and creates a focused learning plan to master it.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Act as a friendly English teacher for A1 students. Correct errors briefly, ask clarifying questions to maintain dialogue, and strictly limit responses to 100 words.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
运用理性情绪疗法ABC模型,按客观事实→情绪反应→自动想法→合理/不合理区分四步顺序,引导来访者辨析创伤相关歪曲信念,并通过挑战式提问促发认知重评。
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Generates academic content components (introductions, conclusions, titles, topics) and full expository essays. Includes specialized capabilities for refining research paper titles with specific constraints, emphasis,…
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Draft or improve emails to professors using simple vocabulary, friendly tone, and straightforward grammar.
Questions about ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程
What does the ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 skill do?
Is ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 safe to install?
What can ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/DocSkill/%E5 — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 skill do?
- Is ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 safe to install?
- What can ORS量表动态监测与基线锚定规程 access on my machine?