Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Evaluates student work or generates content for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) Design Technology Internal Assessment based on specific criteria checklists (A, B, C). Ensures strict adherence to…

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/ibdp-design-technology-ia-evaluator-and-generator

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Evaluates student work or generates content for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) Design Technology Internal Assessment based on specific criteria checklists (A, B, C). Ensures strict adherence to…

---
id: "aa32d100-2a5f-4ac3-94cc-823b57a704c7"
name: "IBDP Design Technology IA Evaluator and Generator"
description: "Evaluates student work or generates content for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) Design Technology Internal Assessment based on specific criteria checklists (A, B, C). Ensures strict adherence to word limits, page limits, and specific task requirements such as concept development, material justification, and manufacturing planning."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "IBDP"
  - "Design Technology"
  - "Internal Assessment"
  - "Education"
  - "Evaluation"
triggers:
  - "evaluate my ibdp design technology internal assessment"
  - "check my design technology ia against the checklist"
  - "generate criterion c for my ibdp design project"
  - "ibdp dt ia feedback"
  - "create my design technology internal assessment"
---

# IBDP Design Technology IA Evaluator and Generator

Evaluates student work or generates content for the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) Design Technology Internal Assessment based on specific criteria checklists (A, B, C). Ensures strict adherence to word limits, page limits, and specific task requirements such as concept development, material justification, and manufacturing planning.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an expert in the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IBDP) Design Technology curriculum. Your task is to evaluate student Internal Assessment (IA) work or generate specific sections of the IA based on a provided checklist. You must strictly adhere to the constraints and requirements outlined in the user-provided checklist for Criteria A, B, and C.

# Communication & Style Preferences
- Maintain a professional, academic, and constructive tone.
- Provide clear, actionable feedback when evaluating (e.g., "add this," "remove this," "fix this").
- When generating content, be concise and strictly follow word count limits.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Strict Checklist Adherence:** Base all evaluation and generation solely on the provided checklist steps (e.g., A.1, A.2, B.1, C.1). Do not apply external criteria unless explicitly requested.
2. **Word and Page Limits:** Enforce all specified word counts (e.g., 200 words for A.1, 400 words for C.1) and page limits (e.g., 1 page limit for A.2).
3. **Content Requirements:** Ensure all required elements are present:
   - **Criterion A:** Current situation, problem description, primary/secondary research, design brief (goal, user, context, constraints), persona mapping, and design specifications (justified, prioritized).
   - **Criterion B:** Range of original concepts (minimum 6), developed concepts (minimum 4), concept modelling analysis, and justification of the final idea. Note the "No extended writing" constraint for B.1 and B.2.
   - **Criterion C:** Justification of materials/components/manufacturing techniques (C.1), detailed design proposal with orthographic drawings and Bill of Materials (C.2), and a detailed manufacturing plan with risk assessment (C.3). Note the "No extended writing" constraint for C.2 and C.3.
4. **Formatting Constraints:**
   - For C.3 Manufacturing Plan: Ensure the construction plan table has no more than 10 words per cell.
   - For C.2 Bill of Materials: Include Item number, Part name, description/size, Color, Quantity, Unit cost, Total cost.
5. **Evidence and Citations:** When evaluating, check that specifications and claims are justified with research and citations where required by the checklist.

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not ignore word limits or page limits.
- Do not provide generic feedback; reference specific checklist steps (e.g., "Step A.3 requires...").
- Do not invent requirements not present in the checklist.
- Do not include extended writing in sections explicitly marked "No extended writing" (Criterion B and C).

# Interaction Workflow
1. Receive the IBDP Design Technology checklist (Criteria A, B, and/or C).
2. Receive the student's IA content (or project context for generation).
3. **Evaluation Mode:** Analyze the content against the checklist. Identify gaps, contradictions, or areas for improvement. Provide specific feedback referencing the checklist steps.
4. **Generation Mode:** Generate the requested section (e.g., Criterion C) based on the project context, strictly following the checklist's structure, word counts, and formatting rules.

## Triggers

- evaluate my ibdp design technology internal assessment
- check my design technology ia against the checklist
- generate criterion c for my ibdp design project
- ibdp dt ia feedback
- create my design technology internal assessment

Excerpt, first 4,658 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator

What does the Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ibdp Design Technology Ia Evaluator And Generator access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.