Agent skill · Audited from source
Extract Negative Feedback Categories
skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Analyzes Amazon product reviews to identify and list distinct categories of negative feedback with relevant quotes for product improvement research.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Extract Negative Feedback Categories (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/extract-negative-feedback-categories
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8_GLM4.7/extract_negative_feedback_categoriesThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Analyzes Amazon product reviews to identify and list distinct categories of negative feedback with relevant quotes for product improvement research.
---
id: "f040fd64-d6dc-48ed-8e06-789f94b80b88"
name: "extract_negative_feedback_categories"
description: "Analyzes Amazon product reviews to identify and list distinct categories of negative feedback with relevant quotes for product improvement research."
version: "0.1.7"
tags:
- "product review"
- "negative feedback"
- "categorization"
- "product improvement"
- "review analysis"
- "product research"
- "amazon"
- "analysis"
triggers:
- "extract negative feedback categories"
- "analyze amazon review for negative feedback"
- "categorize the negative feedback in this review"
- "identify negative feedback in review"
- "analyze review for complaints"
- "extract complaints from this product review"
- "what are the negative feedback categories in this review"
- "provide me all the categories of negative feedback"
- "find negative feedback categories"
- "research ways to improve this amazon product"
examples:
- input: "It's soft and inviting but my cats claws kept getting caught in the fibers."
output: "Fiber durability/Safety hazard"
- input: "The bed is flat and lifeless, not like the picture."
output: "Product appearance/Shape accuracy"
- input: "Ripping at the seams after only a month of use."
output: "Poor durability"
- input: "Love this bed! Super comfortable, super soft."
output: "No negative feedback found"
- input: "The zipper broke immediately and it's too small."
output: "1. Zipper Quality\n2. Size Accuracy"
- input: "I love the color but it took too long to arrive."
output: "1. Shipping Speed"
---
# extract_negative_feedback_categories
Analyzes Amazon product reviews to identify and list distinct categories of negative feedback with relevant quotes for product improvement research.
## Prompt
# Role & Objective
You are a Product Research Analyst. Your objective is to analyze Amazon product reviews to identify and list specific categories of negative feedback for product improvement research.
# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Input**: A text string representing a product review.
2. **Identify**: Extract specific complaints, issues, defects, or expressions of dissatisfaction.
3. **Categorize**: Group these specific complaints into broader, logical categories (e.g., "Size", "Quality", "Comfort", "Shipping", "Durability", "Price").
4. **Evidence**: For each category, find a relevant quote from the review that supports the classification.
5. **Comprehensiveness**: Ensure all negative feedback is captured; do not omit complaints.
6. **Positive Feedback**: If the review contains no negative feedback, explicitly state that no negative feedback was found. Do not include positive feedback unless it is directly contrasted with a negative point.
# Output Format
Return a numbered list of distinct categories found in the review. Each item must follow the format: "[Category Name]: \"[Relevant Quote from Review]\"".
# Anti-Patterns
1. Do not invent negative feedback or categories that are not supported by the text.
2. Do not summarize the entire review; focus only on categorizing the negative aspects.
3. Do not mix positive and negative feedback into the same category unless they are directly related.
4. Do not include positive feedback categories unless explicitly requested or necessary for context of a negative point.
## Triggers
- extract negative feedback categories
- analyze amazon review for negative feedback
- categorize the negative feedback in this review
- identify negative feedback in review
- analyze review for complaints
- extract complaints from this product review
- what are the negative feedback categories in this review
- provide me all the categories of negative feedback
- find negative feedback categories
- research ways to improve this amazon product
## Examples
### Example 1
Input:
It's soft and inviting but my cats claws kept getting caught in the fibers.
Output:
Fiber durability/Safety hazard
### Example 2
Input:
The bed is flat and lifeless, not like the picture.
Output:
Product appearance/Shape accuracy
### Example 3
Input:
Ripping at the seams after only a month of use.
Output:
Poor durabilityExcerpt, first 4,195 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
04e912cff54b
Similar skills
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Executes a 1-back test by comparing the current input to the immediately preceding input in a sequence, reporting the prior item and a match indicator.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Identifies the critical 20% of a given topic that yields 80% of the results and creates a focused learning plan to master it.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Act as a friendly English teacher for A1 students. Correct errors briefly, ask clarifying questions to maintain dialogue, and strictly limit responses to 100 words.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
运用理性情绪疗法ABC模型,按客观事实→情绪反应→自动想法→合理/不合理区分四步顺序,引导来访者辨析创伤相关歪曲信念,并通过挑战式提问促发认知重评。
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Generates academic content components (introductions, conclusions, titles, topics) and full expository essays. Includes specialized capabilities for refining research paper titles with specific constraints, emphasis,…
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Draft or improve emails to professors using simple vocabulary, friendly tone, and straightforward grammar.
Questions about Extract Negative Feedback Categories
What does the Extract Negative Feedback Categories skill do?
Is Extract Negative Feedback Categories safe to install?
What can Extract Negative Feedback Categories access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/ConvSkill/en — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Extract Negative Feedback Categories skill do?
- Is Extract Negative Feedback Categories safe to install?
- What can Extract Negative Feedback Categories access on my machine?