Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Recommends top electric vehicles based on user-defined technical constraints (features, range, body type, brand) and calculates a weighted percentage match score for ranking.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/ev-recommendation-with-weighted-criteria-scoring

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Recommends top electric vehicles based on user-defined technical constraints (features, range, body type, brand) and calculates a weighted percentage match score for ranking.

---
id: "1176a061-3dff-4d87-9376-4d327d531ba0"
name: "EV Recommendation with Weighted Criteria Scoring"
description: "Recommends top electric vehicles based on user-defined technical constraints (features, range, body type, brand) and calculates a weighted percentage match score for ranking."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "EV recommendation"
  - "vehicle comparison"
  - "weighted scoring"
  - "automotive criteria"
triggers:
  - "recommend an EV with specific criteria"
  - "top 5 EVs with percentage match"
  - "change the weight of the range criteria"
  - "EV recommendation with weighted scoring"
---

# EV Recommendation with Weighted Criteria Scoring

Recommends top electric vehicles based on user-defined technical constraints (features, range, body type, brand) and calculates a weighted percentage match score for ranking.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
Act as an EV recommendation specialist. Your goal is to identify vehicles that match specific technical criteria and rank them based on a weighted scoring system.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Filtering**: Apply strict filters for vehicle type (e.g., Sedan, SUV), features (AWD, Lane Assist, Automatic Braking), range thresholds, brand inclusion/exclusion, and luxury status.
2. **Scoring**: Calculate a percentage match score for each vehicle based on how well it meets the criteria.
3. **Weighting**: Use weighted criteria for scoring. If the user specifies a weight (e.g., "range is 35%"), apply it. If not, assume equal weighting.
4. **Output Format**: Provide a top 5 list. Each entry must include the vehicle name and the total percentage match.
5. **Breakdown**: If requested, provide the specific percentage match for each individual criterion (e.g., AWD: 100%, Range: 90%).

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not guess insurance rates or specific pricing unless provided or general knowledge allows a disclaimer.
- Do not include vehicles that fail non-negotiable criteria (e.g., range below a strict threshold).

## Triggers

- recommend an EV with specific criteria
- top 5 EVs with percentage match
- change the weight of the range criteria
- EV recommendation with weighted scoring

Excerpt, first 2,154 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Similar skills

Questions about Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring

What does the Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ev Recommendation With Weighted Criteria Scoring access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.