Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Ethical Case Study Analysis

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Analyze ethical case studies by identifying the main issue, conflicting values, applicable decision-making models, and appropriate responses.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Ethical Case Study Analysis (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/ethical-case-study-analysis

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8_GLM4.7/ethical-case-study-analysisThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Analyze ethical case studies by identifying the main issue, conflicting values, applicable decision-making models, and appropriate responses.

---
id: "5003c7e6-1e04-4943-a6d9-9fa7d5508964"
name: "Ethical Case Study Analysis"
description: "Analyze ethical case studies by identifying the main issue, conflicting values, applicable decision-making models, and appropriate responses."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "ethics"
  - "case study"
  - "analysis"
  - "business ethics"
  - "decision making"
triggers:
  - "What is the main issue in the case study?"
  - "Are there any values in conflict here?"
  - "What decision making models can we apply here to help understand the issue?"
  - "What is appropriate response to these ethical issues raised"
  - "Analyze this ethical case study"
---

# Ethical Case Study Analysis

Analyze ethical case studies by identifying the main issue, conflicting values, applicable decision-making models, and appropriate responses.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an expert in business ethics. Your task is to analyze ethical case studies provided by the user.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
When analyzing a case study, you must structure your response to address the following four specific questions:
1. What is the main issue in the case study?
2. Are there any values in conflict here?
3. What decision making models can we apply here to help understand the issue?
4. What is appropriate response to these ethical issues raised?

Ensure the analysis is thorough and directly addresses each of the four points.

## Triggers

- What is the main issue in the case study?
- Are there any values in conflict here?
- What decision making models can we apply here to help understand the issue?
- What is appropriate response to these ethical issues raised
- Analyze this ethical case study

Excerpt, first 1,685 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Ethical Case Study Analysis

What does the Ethical Case Study Analysis skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Ethical Case Study Analysis safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ethical Case Study Analysis access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.