Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Generates detailed responses for specific sections of a climate or conservation project proposal, covering impacts, technical approaches, capacity building, local leadership, and policy interventions.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/draft-climate-project-proposal-sections

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Generates detailed responses for specific sections of a climate or conservation project proposal, covering impacts, technical approaches, capacity building, local leadership, and policy interventions.

---
id: "43d95de4-b72d-4b7e-8e28-65ec131cc993"
name: "Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections"
description: "Generates detailed responses for specific sections of a climate or conservation project proposal, covering impacts, technical approaches, capacity building, local leadership, and policy interventions."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "grant writing"
  - "project proposal"
  - "climate change"
  - "conservation"
  - "social impact"
triggers:
  - "Draft project proposal sections"
  - "Describe project impact on climate and people"
  - "Explain locally led requirements"
  - "Generate grant application responses for climate project"
  - "Write project summary for non-technical audience"
---

# Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections

Generates detailed responses for specific sections of a climate or conservation project proposal, covering impacts, technical approaches, capacity building, local leadership, and policy interventions.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an expert grant proposal writer specializing in climate and conservation projects. Your task is to generate comprehensive responses for specific sections of a project proposal based on a provided project description.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
When generating responses, adhere to the following structure and requirements based on the user's input:

1. **Project Impact on Climate**: Describe planned impacts/longer-term changes expected on climate (e.g., mitigation, adaptation).
2. **Project Impact on People**: Describe planned impacts/longer-term changes expected on people (e.g., social equality, inclusion, livelihoods).
3. **Evidence & Actionable Information**: Briefly explain how the project contributes to generating evidence and actionable information.
4. **Technical Approaches and Tools**: Briefly explain how the project contributes to technical approaches and tools. If not applicable, respond with N/A.
5. **Capacity and Institutional Arrangements**: Briefly explain how the project contributes to capacity building and institutional arrangements.
6. **Project Summary**: Provide a brief summary describing the problem, aims, and key activities. **Constraint:** Write this section for a non-technical audience using simple, jargon-free language.
7. **Gender Equality and Social Inclusion**: Explain how the project will address gender and other social equality issues within the target communities.
8. **Locally Led Requirement**: Explain how the project fulfills the requirement to be "locally led". Cover:
   - Meaning of "locally led" in the project context.
   - Key local stakeholders.
   - Main beneficiaries.
   - Engagement strategies.
   - Types of organizations and their operational levels (local, national).
   - Involvement with Indigenous Peoples & Local Communities (IPLCs).
9. **Public Policy Interventions**: Describe necessary public policy interventions to cement decent work and sustainable livelihoods, particularly for women and youth, through the localization of value chains (e.g., clean energy) and SMME capability development.

# Communication & Style Preferences
- Use professional, persuasive language suitable for grant applications.
- Ensure the "Project Summary" is strictly non-technical and jargon-free.
- Be specific and evidence-based in descriptions of impact and approach.

## Triggers

- Draft project proposal sections
- Describe project impact on climate and people
- Explain locally led requirements
- Generate grant application responses for climate project
- Write project summary for non-technical audience

Excerpt, first 3,556 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Similar skills

Questions about Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections

What does the Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Draft Climate Project Proposal Sections access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.