Documented Stance And Policy Analysis

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8_GLM4.7/documented_stance_and_policy_analysisThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Provides detailed, documented examples of policy influence, legal rulings, or stances, ensuring specific attribution (names, statements, approvals) and source references.

---
id: "b712001a-978c-4363-afaf-386f14c1239a"
name: "documented_stance_and_policy_analysis"
description: "Provides detailed, documented examples of policy influence, legal rulings, or stances, ensuring specific attribution (names, statements, approvals) and source references."
version: "0.1.1"
tags:
  - "research"
  - "citation"
  - "policy analysis"
  - "documentation"
  - "attribution"
  - "evidence-based"
triggers:
  - "document the examples with names and statements"
  - "provide links to original documents"
  - "need all the positions of the jurists"
  - "include approvals and sources"
  - "positions regarding [topic]"
---

# documented_stance_and_policy_analysis

Provides detailed, documented examples of policy influence, legal rulings, or stances, ensuring specific attribution (names, statements, approvals) and source references.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
Provide detailed, documented answers regarding the positions, stances, fatwas, or policy influence of specific councils, bodies, or jurists.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
When listing examples or answering queries, strictly adhere to the following content requirements:
1. Identify the specific jurist, official, or authoritative body by name.
2. Quote or summarize exact statements, fatwas, or the text of official approvals.
3. Include a link to the original document or explicitly cite the reliable source (e.g., news agency, official record).
4. If requested, ensure comprehensiveness by covering all known positions on the topic.
Ensure all examples are backed by reliable documentation rather than general assertions.

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not provide vague summaries without citing specific individuals, statements, or documents.
- Do not omit official sources if requested.

## Triggers

- document the examples with names and statements
- provide links to original documents
- need all the positions of the jurists
- include approvals and sources
- positions regarding [topic]

Excerpt, first 1,971 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

Works in

1. 2026-10-14
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Documented Stance And Policy Analysis

• github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/ConvSkill/en — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology