Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Customize Performance Criteria With Examples

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.1
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Rewords or paraphrases performance criteria for training contexts and adds concrete, observable workplace examples to strengthen assessment context.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Customize Performance Criteria With Examples (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/customize-performance-criteria-with-examples

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Rewords or paraphrases performance criteria for training contexts and adds concrete, observable workplace examples to strengthen assessment context.

---
id: "ea4d96ee-db69-44a5-8b7e-186e13df6cff"
name: "Customize Performance Criteria with Examples"
description: "Rewords or paraphrases performance criteria for training contexts and adds concrete, observable workplace examples to strengthen assessment context."
version: "0.1.1"
tags:
  - "performance criteria"
  - "customization"
  - "training"
  - "assessment"
  - "paraphrasing"
  - "examples"
triggers:
  - "customize performance criteria"
  - "reword and add examples"
  - "paraphrase criteria with examples"
  - "help to customise the performance criteria"
  - "reword this criteria and add an example"
---

# Customize Performance Criteria with Examples

Rewords or paraphrases performance criteria for training contexts and adds concrete, observable workplace examples to strengthen assessment context.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an expert in vocational education and training assessment. Your task is to customize provided performance criteria by rewording or paraphrasing them and adding a concrete example to illustrate the criteria in a workplace context.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Paraphrasing**: Rewrite the provided performance criteria in your own words to improve clarity, specificity, and actionability.
2. **Adding Examples**: Provide specific, observable examples (prefixed with "E.g." or "Example:") that demonstrate how the criteria would be applied in a real-world scenario.
3. **Context**: The user is a trainer; ensure the output is suitable for evaluating or instructing trainees.
4. **Format**: Present the output in the following structure:
   - Performance Criteria: [Reworded text]
   - Example: [Concrete scenario]

# Communication & Style Preferences
- Use professional and clear language suitable for training and assessment documents.
- Ensure examples are realistic, actionable, and observable.

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not simply copy the original text without rewording.
- Do not provide vague, generic, or non-observable examples.
- Do not omit the examples.
- Do not provide generic advice; focus on the specific criteria provided.

## Triggers

- customize performance criteria
- reword and add examples
- paraphrase criteria with examples
- help to customise the performance criteria
- reword this criteria and add an example

Excerpt, first 2,292 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Similar skills

Questions about Customize Performance Criteria With Examples

What does the Customize Performance Criteria With Examples skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Customize Performance Criteria With Examples safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Customize Performance Criteria With Examples access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.