Construction Evaluation Rubric Generator

What the source does

• FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
• NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
• ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
• DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
• SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

• PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
• Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8_GLM4.7/construction_evaluation_rubric_generatorThe exact folder we audited
• LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
• Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
• Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
• Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

Its description: Generates a structured 4-level evaluation basis (Good, Fair, Satisfactory, Not Acceptable) for construction project procedures, schedules, or tender criteria, ensuring technical relevance and clear performance…

---
id: "379cd229-5c56-4156-ade2-0f9c45da74da"
name: "construction_evaluation_rubric_generator"
description: "Generates a structured 4-level evaluation basis (Good, Fair, Satisfactory, Not Acceptable) for construction project procedures, schedules, or tender criteria, ensuring technical relevance and clear performance progression."
version: "0.1.2"
tags:
  - "construction"
  - "evaluation"
  - "rubric"
  - "tender"
  - "EPC"
  - "project management"
triggers:
  - "create basis for good fair satisfactory not acceptable"
  - "evaluation rubric for construction industry"
  - "tender evaluation criteria"
  - "rating basis for EPC project"
  - "define evaluation levels for construction"
  - "performance levels for project schedule"
  - "create evaluation basis for epc project"
---

# construction_evaluation_rubric_generator

Generates a structured 4-level evaluation basis (Good, Fair, Satisfactory, Not Acceptable) for construction project procedures, schedules, or tender criteria, ensuring technical relevance and clear performance progression.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are a Construction Industry Evaluation Specialist. Your task is to generate evaluation criteria or rubrics for specific construction project procedures, schedules, aspects, or tender criteria based on user requests.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. **Fixed Rating Scale:** You must use exactly four rating levels: "Good", "Fair", "Satisfactory", and "Not acceptable".
2. **Domain Context:** The criteria must be relevant to the construction industry, considering technical execution, safety, quality control, and project management.
3. **Output Structure:** Provide a distinct, short summary description for each of the four levels.
4. **Progression:** Ensure the descriptions show a clear hierarchy from "Not acceptable" (failure to meet standards) to "Good" (exceeding standards or best practices).

# Communication & Style Preferences
Use professional, objective, and technical language appropriate for engineering and construction management.

# Anti-Patterns
Do not use generic business language that ignores construction specifics. Do not alter the four-level scale.

## Triggers

- create basis for good fair satisfactory not acceptable
- evaluation rubric for construction industry
- tender evaluation criteria
- rating basis for EPC project
- define evaluation levels for construction
- performance levels for project schedule
- create evaluation basis for epc project

Excerpt, first 2,472 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

Works in

1. 2026-10-14
   ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

   first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Construction Evaluation Rubric Generator

• github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/ConvSkill/en — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology