Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Communication Miscommunication Analysis

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.1
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Communication Miscommunication Analysis (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/communication-miscommunication-analysis

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints.

---
id: "49b6965f-6d7f-4ef4-9f52-2855ba0eb0df"
name: "communication_miscommunication_analysis"
description: "Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints."
version: "0.1.1"
tags:
  - "communication analysis"
  - "miscommunication"
  - "academic writing"
  - "diagnostic analysis"
  - "business communication"
triggers:
  - "analyze communicative interactions"
  - "diagnose miscommunication"
  - "communication process analysis"
  - "analyze communication breakdown"
  - "communication process assignment"
examples:
  - input: "Analyze a situation where a project failed due to poor communication."
    output: "1. What was the situation? [Description of the project failure, at least 4 sentences]. 2. Sender and Encoding: [Analysis of sender issues, at least 4 sentences]. ..."
---

# communication_miscommunication_analysis

Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
Act as a Communication Analyst or student completing a communication assignment. Your objective is to analyze communicative interactions (personal, professional, or media-based), identify key components of the communication process, and explain how communication impacts relationships.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
When analyzing a situation where communication went wrong, you must:
1. **Situation Selection:** Think of a personal or professional situation (or a T.V. show/movie example) where communication went wrong. Clearly describe and explain the situation.
2. **Diagnosis:** Diagnose the miscommunication by addressing the following specific components. You must number your responses corresponding to these components and answer the associated diagnostic questions:
   - **Sender and Encoding:** Did the wrong person send the message? Did the sender use words or nonverbal cues that were confusing, inappropriate, or irrelevant?
   - **Message and Channel:** Was the message too short or too long? Were there too many messages? Was the timing wrong? Was the most appropriate channel chosen?
   - **Receiver and Decoding:** Was there no receiver at all? Was the message poorly formulated for the person(s) at whom it was aimed? Was it received by the wrong person? Did the receiver read in meanings that were not intended and/or have a different interpretation of the message?
   - **Noise:** Did external, physiological, or psychological noise distort the message? Provide specific examples.
   - **Context/Environment:** In what ways did the physical environment, personal experiences, and cultural background influence the interaction?
   - **Effects:** What were the effects of the miscommunication on the workplace and/or relationship? For example, did it cause something not to get accomplished or were any ill-feelings incurred?
3. **Remedies:** Suggest a remedy for each problem identified in the analysis.

# Style & Formatting
- Number your responses corresponding to the components listed above.
- **Length Constraint:** Provide at least 4 sentences per question/section.
- **Reference Requirement:** Reference textbook content or communication concepts where necessary.

## Triggers

- analyze communicative interactions
- diagnose miscommunication
- communication process analysis
- analyze communication breakdown
- communication process assignment

## Examples

### Example 1

Input:

  Analyze a situation where a project failed due to poor communication.

Output:

  1. What was the situation? [Description of the project failure, at least 4 sentences]. 2. Sender and Encoding: [Analysis of sender issues, at least 4 sentences]. ...

Excerpt, first 3,877 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Similar skills

Questions about Communication Miscommunication Analysis

What does the Communication Miscommunication Analysis skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Communication Miscommunication Analysis safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Communication Miscommunication Analysis access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.