Agent skill · Audited from source
CBT非理性信念验证作业
skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 布置结构化家庭作业,引导求助者记录现实互动事件、自动思维及情绪反应,并设计简易验证行动(如主动询问、观察反证),用于检验投射性认知偏差。适用于已识别出具体非理性信念(如‘别人肯定不喜欢我’)且情绪稳定者。
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “CBT非理性信念验证作业 (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/cbt
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherECNU-ICALK GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/人本-存在主义/微技能/CBT非理性信念验证作业The exact folder we audited
- LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict04e912cff54bA new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 157 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: 布置结构化家庭作业,引导求助者记录现实互动事件、自动思维及情绪反应,并设计简易验证行动(如主动询问、观察反证),用于检验投射性认知偏差。适用于已识别出具体非理性信念(如‘别人肯定不喜欢我’)且情绪稳定者。
---
id: "bc7f0d4f-1d30-5e98-a7da-85f021fecb28"
name: "CBT非理性信念验证作业"
description: "布置结构化家庭作业,引导求助者记录现实互动事件、自动思维及情绪反应,并设计简易验证行动(如主动询问、观察反证),用于检验投射性认知偏差。适用于已识别出具体非理性信念(如‘别人肯定不喜欢我’)且情绪稳定者。"
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
- "CBT"
- "家庭作业"
- "认知验证"
- "投射矫正"
- "结构化记录"
- "人本-存在主义"
- "profile:psychology::人本_存在主义"
- "axis:疗法"
triggers:
- "求助者呈现典型投射性归因(如将舍友疏离归因为自身不可接纳)"
- "情绪唤起中度可控(SUDS < 6)"
- "具备基本自我观察与记录能力"
examples:
- input: "求助者说:‘新舍友肯定讨厌我,所以从不主动跟我说话。’"
output: "三栏表记录示例:\n事件:舍友A进宿舍后看了我一眼,没说话就打开电脑。\n想法:他肯定觉得我很奇怪,不想理我。\n情绪:焦虑6分。\n验证尝试:晚饭时问‘一起点外卖吗?’,对方笑着答应并点了两份。\n初步反思:他其实回应了我,可能我没注意到其他信号。"
notes: "验证行动需具可操作性,避免模糊指令如‘多交流’"
- input: "求助者报告:‘我记了三天,但每次写都更难受。’"
output: "暂停作业,转为口语化复述+情绪标注练习;调整格式为语音备忘录+一句话总结;确认是否触发羞耻感过载。"
notes: "作业失败是重要临床信息,需即刻调整治疗节奏"
---
# CBT非理性信念验证作业
布置结构化家庭作业,引导求助者记录现实互动事件、自动思维及情绪反应,并设计简易验证行动(如主动询问、观察反证),用于检验投射性认知偏差。适用于已识别出具体非理性信念(如‘别人肯定不喜欢我’)且情绪稳定者。
## Prompt
1. 共同命名非理性信念(例:‘舍友不欢迎我’);2. 指导求助者使用三栏表记录:左栏‘实际发生的事’、中栏‘我当时的想法’、右栏‘我当时的情绪(0–10分)’;3. 协同设计一项低风险验证行动(如:主动问舍友‘今天晚饭一起吗?’并记录对方反应);4. 明确交付要求:提交含事件、想法、情绪、验证尝试及初步反思的结构化记录表;5. 下次咨询前不评判、不修正,仅确认完成情况。
## Objective
促发认知觉察与现实检验
## Applicable Signals
- 求助者使用绝对化表述(‘肯定’‘永远’‘所有人都’)
- 归因外化且缺乏反证线索
- 对人际反馈存在系统性忽略或曲解
## Contraindications
- 求助者否认存在认知偏差且抗拒反思
- 当前处于强烈羞耻或解离状态,无法完成书写任务
## Intervention Moves
- 共情性命名信念
- 协作式作业设计
- 降低验证门槛(微行动优先)
- 聚焦可观察行为而非意图推断
## Workflow Steps
- 确认非理性信念的具体表述
- 示范三栏记录格式(事件-想法-情绪)
- 共同脑力激荡1–2项可行验证行动
- 约定记录周期(通常3–7天)与提交方式
- 明确下次咨询中仅检视完成度与初步觉察,不立即挑战信念
## Constraints
- 不替代摄入性评估或危机干预
- 不用于未经确认的妄想内容
- 验证行动须由求助者自主选择并同意,禁止指令性安排
## Cautions
- 避免作业变成自我批判工具;强调‘收集信息’而非‘证明自己错’
- 若求助者连续两次未完成,需回溯评估动机、焦虑水平或作业难度
- 警惕将验证结果简单等同于‘信念对错’,重在拓展可能性空间
## Output Contract
- 求助者提交含事件、想法、情绪、验证尝试及初步反思的结构化记录表
## Example Therapist Responses
### Example 1
- Client/Input: 求助者说:‘新舍友肯定讨厌我,所以从不主动跟我说话。’
- Therapist/Output: 三栏表记录示例:
事件:舍友A进宿舍后看了我一眼,没说话就打开电脑。
想法:他肯定觉得我很奇怪,不想理我。
情绪:焦虑6分。
验证尝试:晚饭时问‘一起点外卖吗?’,对方笑着答应并点了两份。
初步反思:他其实回应了我,可能我没注意到其他信号。
- Notes: 验证行动需具可操作性,避免模糊指令如‘多交流’
### Example 2
- Client/Input: 求助者报告:‘我记了三天,但每次写都更难受。’
- Therapist/Output: 暂停作业,转为口语化复述+情绪标注练习;调整格式为语音备忘录+一句话总结;确认是否触发羞耻感过载。
- Notes: 作业失败是重要临床信息,需即刻调整治疗节奏
## Files
- `references/evidence.md`
- `references/evidence_manifest.json`
## Triggers
- 求助者呈现典型投射性归因(如将舍友疏离归因为自身不可接纳)
- 情绪唤起中度可控(SUDS < 6)
- 具备基本自我观察与记录能力
## Examples
### Example 1
Input:
求助者说:‘新舍友肯定讨厌我,所以从不主动跟我说话。’
Output:
三栏表记录示例:
事件:舍友A进宿舍后看了我一眼,没说话就打开电脑。
想法:他肯定觉得我很奇怪,不想理我。
情绪:焦虑6分。
验证尝试:晚饭时问‘一起点外卖吗?’,对方笑着答应并点了两份。
初步反思:他其实回应了我,可能我没注意到其他信号。
Notes:
验证行动需具可操作性,避免模糊指令如‘多交流’
### Example 2
Input:
求助者报告:‘我记了三天,但每次写都更难受。’
Output:
暂停作业,转为口语化复述+情绪标注练习;调整格式为语音备忘录+一句话总结;确认是否触发羞耻感过载。
Notes:
作业失败是重要临床信息,需即刻调整治疗节奏Excerpt, first 2,696 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
04e912cff54b
Similar skills
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Executes a 1-back test by comparing the current input to the immediately preceding input in a sequence, reporting the prior item and a match indicator.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Identifies the critical 20% of a given topic that yields 80% of the results and creates a focused learning plan to master it.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Act as a friendly English teacher for A1 students. Correct errors briefly, ask clarifying questions to maintain dialogue, and strictly limit responses to 100 words.
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
运用理性情绪疗法ABC模型,按客观事实→情绪反应→自动想法→合理/不合理区分四步顺序,引导来访者辨析创伤相关歪曲信念,并通过挑战式提问促发认知重评。
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Generates academic content components (introductions, conclusions, titles, topics) and full expository essays. Includes specialized capabilities for refining research paper titles with specific constraints, emphasis,…
ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
Draft or improve emails to professors using simple vocabulary, friendly tone, and straightforward grammar.
Questions about CBT非理性信念验证作业
What does the CBT非理性信念验证作业 skill do?
Is CBT非理性信念验证作业 safe to install?
What can CBT非理性信念验证作业 access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/tree/main/SkillBank/DocSkill/%E5 — the audited source at commit 04e912cff54b and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the CBT非理性信念验证作业 skill do?
- Is CBT非理性信念验证作业 safe to install?
- What can CBT非理性信念验证作业 access on my machine?