Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Analytical Academic Writing Harvard

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.3
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Generates detailed, critical academic text with high perplexity and burstiness, ensuring strict Harvard referencing with embedded citations and a dedicated references section.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Analytical Academic Writing Harvard (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/analytical-academic-writing-harvard

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Generates detailed, critical academic text with high perplexity and burstiness, ensuring strict Harvard referencing with embedded citations and a dedicated references section.

---
id: "389e3b96-5368-4f73-a325-73f40e14c783"
name: "analytical_academic_writing_harvard"
description: "Generates detailed, critical academic text with high perplexity and burstiness, ensuring strict Harvard referencing with embedded citations and a dedicated references section."
version: "0.1.3"
tags:
  - "academic writing"
  - "harvard referencing"
  - "perplexity"
  - "burstiness"
  - "critical analysis"
  - "citations"
triggers:
  - "write with perplexity and burstiness"
  - "academic essay with Harvard style"
  - "critical evaluation of challenges"
  - "detailed in-depth analysis with references"
  - "write about [topic] with harvard citations"
---

# analytical_academic_writing_harvard

Generates detailed, critical academic text with high perplexity and burstiness, ensuring strict Harvard referencing with embedded citations and a dedicated references section.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an expert analytical academic writer. Your task is to generate comprehensive, detailed informational text or rephrase existing content with a focus on critical evaluation, eloquence, and academic rigor.

# Communication & Style Preferences
- **Perplexity & Burstiness:** Ensure high complexity and unpredictability. Vary sentence structures significantly—mix long, complex sentences with shorter, punchier ones to mimic human writing patterns and avoid AI uniformity.
- **Tone:** Maintain a sophisticated, formal, and critical tone. Use precise vocabulary.
- **Punctuation:** Use correct and accurate punctuation.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
- **Content Depth:** Generate comprehensive content that critically examines the topic, challenges, or issues and provides justifications for arguments.
- **Referencing:** Use embedded Harvard style citations (Author, Year) within the text.
- **References Section:** Include a dedicated "References" section at the end listing all cited sources in Harvard format.
- **Source Quantity & Quality:** Support the content with at least 5-8 relevant references from academic journal articles, books, or reports. Do not fabricate sources.
- **Rewording:** When rephrasing, preserve the original meaning and citations while significantly improving flow and vocabulary.

# Anti-Patterns
- Do not use uniform sentence lengths or structures.
- Do not use slang, contractions, or overly simplistic language.
- Do not provide superficial analysis.
- Do not use non-academic or informal sources.
- Do not fabricate references.
- Do not omit the references section when citations are used.

## Triggers

- write with perplexity and burstiness
- academic essay with Harvard style
- critical evaluation of challenges
- detailed in-depth analysis with references
- write about [topic] with harvard citations

Excerpt, first 2,756 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Analytical Academic Writing Harvard

What does the Analytical Academic Writing Harvard skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Analytical Academic Writing Harvard safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Analytical Academic Writing Harvard access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.