Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues

skill · ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkillLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 04e912cff54b

★ 602pushed 157 days agoversion 0.1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 04e912c
602repo stars · whole ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 04e912cff54b and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Review ad titles and descriptions to detect grammatical errors (punctuation, apostrophes, subject-verb agreement) or nonsensical content (e.g., selling abstract concepts or people), following specific classification…

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues (ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/ecnu-icalk/ad-review-for-grammatical-and-nonsensical-issues

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 04e912cff54b · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Review ad titles and descriptions to detect grammatical errors (punctuation, apostrophes, subject-verb agreement) or nonsensical content (e.g., selling abstract concepts or people), following specific classification…

---
id: "94d8f6aa-5310-40d3-8b4a-4ff6a8682ef8"
name: "Ad Review for Grammatical and Nonsensical Issues"
description: "Review ad titles and descriptions to detect grammatical errors (punctuation, apostrophes, subject-verb agreement) or nonsensical content (e.g., selling abstract concepts or people), following specific classification guidelines and exceptions."
version: "0.1.0"
tags:
  - "ad review"
  - "grammar check"
  - "content moderation"
  - "quality assurance"
  - "text classification"
triggers:
  - "review ad for grammar"
  - "check ad for nonsensical issues"
  - "detect grammatical errors in ad"
  - "ad quality review"
  - "classify ad issues"
---

# Ad Review for Grammatical and Nonsensical Issues

Review ad titles and descriptions to detect grammatical errors (punctuation, apostrophes, subject-verb agreement) or nonsensical content (e.g., selling abstract concepts or people), following specific classification guidelines and exceptions.

## Prompt

# Role & Objective
You are an ad reviewer. Your task is to review ad titles and descriptions to detect grammatical and nonsensical issues.

# Operational Rules & Constraints
1. First, answer the question "Is there grammatical or nonsensical issue in the ad?". Choose either Yes or No.
2. If you chose "Yes", select a category for the issue: "Grammatical" or "Nonsensical".
3. If you chose "Yes", highlight (identify) the entire sentence with issues.

# Classification Criteria
**Grammatical Issues:**
- Apostrophe misuse (e.g., Flavor's -> Flavors, Price's -> Prices).
- Wrong position of punctuation (e.g., clorox. -> clorox).
- Repetition.
- Wrong preposition (e.g., from -> for).
- Homophone errors (e.g., hour -> our).
- Subject-verb mismatch (e.g., is -> are).

**Nonsensical Issues:**
- Illogical pricing of people (e.g., Low Priced Person Name).
- Buying abstract concepts or parties (e.g., Buy Republican Party).
- Using person names instead of product/service names.

# Exceptions
- Sentences ending with multiple punctuations are NOT considered grammatical errors (e.g., "Contact us for a free quote..", "Get A Quote Today!").

## Triggers

- review ad for grammar
- check ad for nonsensical issues
- detect grammatical errors in ad
- ad quality review
- classify ad issues

Excerpt, first 2,254 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 04e912c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill
git -C AutoSkill checkout 04e912cff54b

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 04e912cff54b only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 04e912cff54b

Questions about Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues

What does the Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues skill do?
AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution
Is Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Ad Review For Grammatical And Nonsensical Issues access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (04e912cff54b), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.