Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Technical Standards

skill · echoVic/boss-skillMIT licenceAudited 15 Oct 2026 · source 0317d4cb4f54

★ 542pushed 4 days agoversion 1.0.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 15 Oct 2026 · 0317d4c
542repo stars · whole echoVic/boss-skill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 0317d4cb4f54 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 技术规范和最佳实践,确保代码质量和一致性

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Technical Standards (echoVic/boss-skill)”. Retrieved 15 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/echovic/technical-standards

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 15 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 0317d4cb4f54 · 15 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherechoVic GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderechoVic/boss-skill/skill/skills/tech-lead/technical-standardsThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict0317d4cb4f54A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 4 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: 技术规范和最佳实践,确保代码质量和一致性

---
name: tech-lead/technical-standards
description: 技术规范和最佳实践,确保代码质量和一致性
version: 1.0.0
agent: tech-lead
type: guideline
user-invocable: false
agent-invocable: true
dependencies:
  - shared/tech-stack-detection
triggers:
  - 需要定义技术规范时
  - 需要统一代码风格时
metadata:
  internal: true
---

# 技术规范与最佳实践

## 命名规范

| 类型 | 规范 | 示例 |
|------|------|------|
| 变量 | camelCase | `userName`, `isActive` |
| 常量 | UPPER_SNAKE_CASE | `MAX_COUNT`, `API_URL` |
| 函数 | camelCase | `getUserById`, `calculateTotal` |
| 类 | PascalCase | `UserService`, `OrderController` |
| 文件 | kebab-case | `user-service.ts`, `order-controller.ts` |

## 代码组织

- **单一职责**:每个函数/类只做一件事
- **DRY原则**:不要重复代码
- **KISS原则**:保持简单
- **YAGNI原则**:不要过度设计

## 错误处理

- 使用try-catch捕获异常
- 提供有意义的错误信息
- 记录错误日志
- 优雅降级

## 测试要求

- 单元测试覆盖率 ≥ 70%
- 关键路径必须有测试
- 测试要独立、可重复

Excerpt, first 806 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 0317d4c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/echoVic/boss-skill
git -C boss-skill checkout 0317d4cb4f54

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 0317d4cb4f54 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 0317d4cb4f54

Similar skills

Questions about Technical Standards

What does the Technical Standards skill do?
Boss Skill - BMAD 全自动研发流水线(多 Agent 编排)
Is Technical Standards safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Technical Standards access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (0317d4cb4f54), read on 2026-10-15. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.