Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Prd Writing

skill · echoVic/boss-skillMIT licenceAudited 15 Oct 2026 · source 0317d4cb4f54

★ 542pushed 4 days agoversion 1.0.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 15 Oct 2026 · 0317d4c
542repo stars · whole echoVic/boss-skill

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 0317d4cb4f54 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 产品需求文档(PRD)的标准编写格式和内容要求,确保输出完整、清晰、可执行的产品文档

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Prd Writing (echoVic/boss-skill)”. Retrieved 15 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/echovic/prd-writing

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 15 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 0317d4cb4f54 · 15 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherechoVic GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderechoVic/boss-skill/skill/skills/pm/prd-writingThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict0317d4cb4f54A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 4 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: 产品需求文档(PRD)的标准编写格式和内容要求,确保输出完整、清晰、可执行的产品文档

---
name: pm/prd-writing
description: 产品需求文档(PRD)的标准编写格式和内容要求,确保输出完整、清晰、可执行的产品文档
version: 1.0.0
agent: pm
type: guideline
user-invocable: false
agent-invocable: true
dependencies:
  - pm/requirement-penetration
triggers:
  - 需求分析完成,准备输出PRD时
  - 需要标准化PRD格式时
metadata:
  internal: true
---

# PRD 编写指南

## 适用场景

完成需求穿透和调研分析后,需要输出一份完整的产品需求文档(PRD),供设计师、开发者、测试人员使用。

## PRD 标准结构

### 1. 概述

- **功能名称**:[清晰简洁的名称]
- **版本**:1.0
- **日期**:[当前日期]
- **作者**:PM Agent

### 摘要

> 下游 Agent 请优先阅读本节,需要细节时再查阅完整文档。

- **核心目标**:[用一句话描述]
- **目标用户**:[主要用户群体]
- **关键功能**:[3-5 个最核心功能]
- **技术约束**:[重要约束或偏好]
- **优先级**:[MVP 范围说明]

---

### 2. 需求穿透分析(核心章节)

参见 `pm/requirement-penetration` skill 的输出要求。

---

### 3. 竞品调研

#### 3.1 竞品分析

使用 `WebSearch` 搜索相关竞品:

| 竞品 | 核心功能 | 用户体验亮点 | 用户痛点 | 我们的机会 |
|------|----------|--------------|----------|------------|
| [竞品 1] | [功能] | [亮点] | [痛点] | [机会] |
| [竞品 2] | [功能] | [亮点] | [痛点] | [机会] |
| [竞品 3] | [功能] | [亮点] | [痛点] | [机会] |

#### 3.2 差异化策略

| 维度 | 竞品做法 | 我们的做法 | 差异化价值 |
|------|----------|------------|------------|
| [维度 1] | [做法] | [做法] | [价值] |
| [维度 2] | [做法] | [做法] | [价值] |

---

### 4. 目标用户

#### 用户画像 1:[名称]

- **基本特征**:[年龄、职业、收入等]
- **行为特征**:[使用习惯、偏好等]
- **核心需求**:[最想解决的问题]
- **痛点场景**:[具体的痛苦场景描述]
- **期望体验**:[理想的体验是什么样]

#### 用户旅程图

```mermaid
journey
    title 用户完成核心任务的旅程
    section 发现阶段
      了解产品: 3: 用户
      产生兴趣: 4: 用户
    section 使用阶段
      首次使用: 3: 用户
      完成任务: 5: 用户
    section 留存阶段
      持续使用: 4: 用户
      推荐他人: 5: 用户
```

---

### 5. 功能需求

#### FR-001:[需求标题]

- **需求描述**:[清晰的需求描述]
- **用户价值**:[这个功能给用户带来什么价值]
- **优先级**:P0/P1/P2
- **需求来源**:显性/隐性/潜在/惊喜
- **验收标准**:
  - [ ] AC-1:[可测试的标准 1]
  - [ ] AC-2:[可测试的标准 2]
- **边界情况**:
  - [边界情况 1 及处理方式]
  - [边界情况 2 及处理方式]

#### FR-002:[需求标题]

- **需求描述**:[描述]
- **用户价值**:[价值]
- **优先级**:P1
- **需求来源**:[来源]
- **验收标准**:
  - [ ] AC-1:[标准]

---

### 6. 非功能需求

#### NFR-001:性能需求

- **页面加载**:首屏加载 < 2s,完整加载 < 3s
- **交互响应**:用户操作响应 < 100ms
- **API 响应**:接口响应 < 200ms

#### NFR-002:体验需求

- **易用性**:新用户无需教程即可完成核心任务
- **一致性**:交互模式和视觉风格保持一致
- **容错性**:操作可撤销,错误可恢复

#### NFR-003:安全需求

- **数据安全**:敏感数据加密存储和传输
- **隐私保护**:符合相关隐私法规

---

### 7. 用户故事

#### US-001:[故事标题]

- **作为** [用户类型]
- **我想要** [目标行为]
- **以便** [预期价值]
- **验收标准**:
  - [ ] [标准 1]
  - [ ] [标准 2]
- **优先级**:P0

#### US-002:[故事标题]

- **作为** [用户类型]
- **我想要** [目标行为]
- **以便** [预期价值]
- **验收标准**:
  - [ ] [标准]
- **优先级**:P1

---

### 8. 成功指标

| 指标类型 | 指标 | 目标值 | 衡量方式 |
|----------|------|--------|----------|
| 核心指标 | [指标] | [目标] | [方式] |
| 体验指标 | [指标] | [目标] | [方式] |
| 业务指标 | [指标] | [目标] | [方式] |

---

### 9. 范围定义

#### 本期范围(In Scope)

- [功能 1]
- [功能 2]

#### 范围外(Out of Scope)

- [排除项 1]:[排除原因]
- [排除项 2]:[排除原因]

---

### 10. 风险与依赖

#### 风险登记

| 风险 | 可能性 | 影响 | 缓解措施 |
|------|--------|------|----------|
| [风险] | 高/中/低 | 高/中/低 | [措施] |

#### 依赖项

| 依赖 | 类型 | 状态 | 负责人 |
|------|------|------|--------|
| [依赖项] | 技术/业务/外部 | 已就绪/待定 | [负责人] |

---

### 11. 里程碑

| 里程碑 | 内容 | 目标日期 |
|--------|------|----------|
| MVP | [核心功能] | - |
| V1.0 | [完整功能] | - |
| V1.1 | [优化迭代] | - |

---

## 编写原则

### 清晰性
- 使用简单直接的语言
- 避免模糊词汇("可能"、"大概"、"尽量")
- 每个需求都有明确的验收标准

### 完整性
- 覆盖所有必要章节
- 功能需求和非功能需求都要考虑
- 边界情况和异常处理要说明

### 可执行性
- 设计师能根据PRD设计界面
- 开发者能根据PRD编写代码
- 测试人员能根据PRD编写测试用例

### 用户导向
- 每个功能都说明用户价值
- 从用户视角描述需求
- 关注用户体验细节

## 输出要求

1. **文件命名**:`prd-{功能名称}-{日期}.md`
2. **文件位置**:项目根目录或 `docs/` 目录
3. **格式**:Markdown格式,使用标准的章节结构
4. **长度**:根据功能复杂度,通常5-20页

## 质量检查清单

在输出PRD前,检查以下项目:

- [ ] 摘要部分是否清晰,能让读者快速理解核心内容
- [ ] 需求穿透分析是否完整(显性、隐性、潜在、惊喜四层)
- [ ] 每个功能需求是否有明确的验收标准
- [ ] 非功能需求是否考虑(性能、体验、安全)
- [ ] 用户故事是否符合 "作为-我想要-以便" 格式
- [ ] 范围定义是否明确(In Scope 和 Out of Scope)
- [ ] 风险和依赖是否识别
- [ ] 文档格式是否规范,易于阅读

---

**记住**:好的PRD不是功能的堆砌,而是对用户需求的精准洞察和优雅满足。

Excerpt, first 3,658 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 0317d4c

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/echoVic/boss-skill
git -C boss-skill checkout 0317d4cb4f54

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 0317d4cb4f54 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 0317d4cb4f54

Questions about Prd Writing

What does the Prd Writing skill do?
Boss Skill - BMAD 全自动研发流水线(多 Agent 编排)
Is Prd Writing safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Prd Writing access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (0317d4cb4f54), read on 2026-10-15. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.