Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Chat with PDF

skill · claude-office-skills/skillsMIT licenceAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 79d91524ef4c

★ 552pushed 272 days agoversion 1.0
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 31 Oct 2026 · 79d9152
552repo stars · whole claude-office-skills/skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 79d91524ef4c and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Answer questions about PDF content, summarize, and extract information

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Chat with PDF (claude-office-skills/skills)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/claude-office-skills/chat-with-pdf

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 79d91524ef4c · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherclaude-office-skills GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderclaude-office-skills/skills/chat-with-pdfThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceMITAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict79d91524ef4cA new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 272 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Answer questions about PDF content, summarize, and extract information

---
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
# CLAUDE OFFICE SKILL - Enhanced Metadata v2.0
# ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════

# Basic Information
name: Chat with PDF
description: "Answer questions about PDF content, summarize, and extract information"
version: "1.0"
author: claude-office-skills
license: MIT

# Categorization
category: pdf
tags:
  - pdf
  - chat
  - qa
  - extraction
department: All

# AI Model Compatibility
models:
  recommended:
    - claude-sonnet-4
    - claude-opus-4
  compatible:
    - claude-3-5-sonnet
    - gpt-4
    - gpt-4o

# MCP Tools Integration
mcp:
  server: office-mcp
  tools:
    - extract_text_from_pdf
    - get_pdf_metadata

# Skill Capabilities
capabilities:
  - pdf_qa
  - content_extraction
  - summarization

# Language Support
languages:
  - en
  - zh
---

# Chat with PDF

Have intelligent conversations about PDF documents - ask questions, get summaries, and extract specific information.

## Overview

This skill enables you to:
- Ask questions about PDF content
- Get summaries at various detail levels
- Extract specific data points
- Compare information across multiple PDFs
- Find relevant sections quickly

## How to Use

### Basic Interaction
1. Share or upload the PDF document
2. Ask your question or request
3. Get contextual answers with citations

### Question Types

**Factual Questions**
```
"What is the contract value mentioned in this document?"
"Who are the parties involved in this agreement?"
"What are the key dates mentioned?"
```

**Summarization**
```
"Summarize this document in 3 bullet points"
"Give me an executive summary"
"What are the main topics covered?"
```

**Extraction**
```
"Extract all names and titles mentioned"
"List all financial figures in the document"
"Find all action items or deliverables"
```

**Analysis**
```
"What are the risks mentioned in this contract?"
"Are there any ambiguous terms?"
"What obligations does Party A have?"
```

## Output Formats

### Q&A Format
```markdown
**Question**: [Your question]

**Answer**: [Direct answer to your question]

**Source**: Page [X], Section [Y]
> "[Relevant quote from document]"

**Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low]
```

### Summary Format
```markdown
## Document Summary

**Type**: [Contract/Report/Manual/etc.]
**Pages**: [X]
**Date**: [If mentioned]

### Key Points
1. [Main point 1]
2. [Main point 2]
3. [Main point 3]

### Important Details
- [Detail 1]
- [Detail 2]
```

### Extraction Format
```markdown
## Extracted Information

### [Category 1]
| Item | Value | Location |
|------|-------|----------|
| [Item 1] | [Value] | Page X |
| [Item 2] | [Value] | Page Y |

### [Category 2]
...
```

## Best Practices

### For Better Answers
1. **Be specific**: "What is the termination clause?" vs "Tell me about the contract"
2. **Reference sections**: "What does Section 5.2 say about liability?"
3. **Ask follow-ups**: Build on previous answers for deeper understanding

### For Better Extraction
1. **Specify format**: "Extract as a table" or "List as bullet points"
2. **Name the fields**: "Extract: name, date, amount, description"
3. **Set criteria**: "Only extract amounts over $10,000"

### For Better Summaries
1. **Specify length**: "Summarize in 100 words" or "3 bullet points"
2. **Focus area**: "Summarize the financial terms only"
3. **Audience**: "Summarize for a legal team" vs "for executives"

## Example Workflows

### Contract Review
```
1. "What type of contract is this?"
2. "Who are the parties and what are their roles?"
3. "What are the key obligations for each party?"
4. "What is the term and renewal process?"
5. "What are the termination conditions?"
6. "Are there any unusual or concerning clauses?"
```

### Research Paper Analysis
```
1. "What is the main thesis or hypothesis?"
2. "What methodology was used?"
3. "What are the key findings?"
4. "What are the limitations mentioned?"
5. "What future research do they suggest?"
```

### Financial Report
```
1. "What is the total revenue reported?"
2. "How does this compare to last year?"
3. "What are the main expense categories?"
4. "What guidance is given for next quarter?"
5. "Extract all financial metrics into a table"
```

## Multi-Document Support

When working with multiple PDFs:

```
"Compare the terms in Contract A vs Contract B"
"Which document mentions [topic]?"
"Create a summary table comparing key points across all documents"
```

### Comparison Output
```markdown
## Document Comparison

| Aspect | Document A | Document B |
|--------|------------|------------|
| Term Length | 2 years | 3 years |
| Value | $50,000 | $75,000 |
| Termination | 30 days notice | 60 days notice |

### Key Differences
1. [Difference 1]
2. [Difference 2]

### Similarities
1. [Similarity 1]
2. [Similarity 2]
```

## Handling Challenges

### Scanned PDFs (Image-based)
- OCR will be applied automatically
- Quality depends on scan quality
- May have recognition errors

### Complex Layouts
- Tables may need reformatting
- Multi-column text is processed left-to-right
- Footnotes processed separately

### Long Documents
- Ask about specific sections for accuracy
- Request page-by-page summaries for overview
- Use targeted questions over broad ones

## Limitations

- Cannot execute code embedded in PDFs
- Password-protected PDFs need password
- Very large PDFs (500+ pages) may need chunking
- Handwritten content recognition is limited
- Cannot guarantee 100% accuracy on scanned documents
- Charts and images are described, not analyzed numerically

## Privacy Note

Document contents are processed according to the AI provider's privacy policy. For sensitive documents, consider:
- Using on-premise solutions
- Redacting sensitive information first
- Checking data retention policies

Excerpt, first 5,812 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 79d9152

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills
git -C skills checkout 79d91524ef4c

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 79d91524ef4c only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 79d91524ef4c

Similar skills

Questions about Chat with PDF

What does the Chat with PDF skill do?
A curated collection of practical Claude Skills for real-world office tasks
Is Chat with PDF safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Chat with PDF access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (79d91524ef4c), read on 2026-10-31. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.