Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Explicit Checker

skill · bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skillsCC0-1.0 licenceAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 3e049bfcc994

★ 611pushed 2 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 31 Oct 2026 · 3e049bf
611repo stars · whole bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 3e049bfcc994 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Explicit Checker (bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/bitwize-music-studio/explicit-checker

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high0 medium0 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityPASS0
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass.

Findings (0)

No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 3e049bfcc994 · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • Publisherbitwize-music-studio GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderbitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills/skills/explicit-checkerThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceCC0-1.0As the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict3e049bfcc994A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 2 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.

---
name: explicit-checker
description: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.
argument-hint: <album-path or track-path>
model: sonnet
effort: medium
allowed-tools:
  - Read
  - Glob
  - Grep
  - bitwize-music-mcp
---

## Your Task

**Path to scan**: $ARGUMENTS

1. Scan all lyrics for explicit words
2. Report findings with word counts per track
3. Flag mismatches (explicit content but flag says No, or vice versa)
4. Provide summary suitable for distributor submission

---

# Explicit Content Checker

You scan lyrics for explicit content to ensure proper flagging before release.

---

## Explicit Words (Require Explicit = Yes)

These words and variations require the explicit flag:

| Category | Words |
|----------|-------|
| **F-word** | fuck, fucking, fucked, fucker, motherfuck, motherfucker |
| **S-word** | shit, shitting, shitty, bullshit |
| **B-word** | bitch, bitches |
| **C-words** | cunt, cock, cocks |
| **D-word** | dick, dicks |
| **P-word** | pussy, pussies |
| **A-word** | asshole, assholes |
| **Slurs** | whore, slut, n-word, f-word (slur) |
| **Profanity** | goddamn, goddammit |

---

## Clean Words (No Explicit Flag Needed)

These are acceptable without explicit flag:
- damn, hell, crap, ass, bastard, piss

Note: "damn" alone is clean, but "goddamn" is explicit.

---

## Override Support

The MCP `check_explicit_content` tool automatically loads and merges user overrides from `{overrides}/explicit-words.md`. No manual config read or merge logic needed — pass lyrics text and get results with overrides applied.

### Override File Format

**`{overrides}/explicit-words.md`:**
```markdown
# Custom Explicit Words

## Additional Explicit Words
- slang-term
- regional-profanity
- artist-specific-explicit

## Not Explicit (Override Base)
- hell (context: historical/literary)
- damn (context: emphasis)
```

---

## Workflow

### For Album Path

1. Call `list_tracks(album_slug)` — get all tracks with metadata
2. For each track:
   - Call `extract_section(album_slug, track_slug, "lyrics")` — get lyrics text
   - Call `check_explicit_content(lyrics_text)` — returns matches with line numbers (overrides auto-merged)
   - Get Explicit flag from track metadata
   - Compare flag vs. content
3. Generate report

### For Single Track

1. Call `extract_section(album_slug, track_slug, "lyrics")` — get lyrics text
2. Call `check_explicit_content(lyrics_text)` — scan for explicit words
3. Get Explicit flag from track metadata via `get_track(album_slug, track_slug)`
4. Report findings

---

## Output Format

```
EXPLICIT CONTENT SCAN
Album: [Album Name]
Date: [Scan Date]

TRACK RESULTS:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Track 01: [Title]
  Flag: No
  Content: Clean
  Status: ✓ OK

Track 02: [Title]
  Flag: Yes
  Content: fuck (3), shit (2), bitch (1)
  Status: ✓ OK (flag matches content)

Track 03: [Title]
  Flag: No
  Content: fuck (1)
  Status: ⚠️ MISMATCH - Contains explicit content but flag is No

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

SUMMARY:
  Total tracks: 10
  Clean tracks: 7
  Explicit tracks: 3
  Mismatches: 1

ALBUM EXPLICIT FLAG: Yes (any track explicit = album explicit)

ACTION REQUIRED:
  - Track 03: Set Explicit flag to Yes
```

---

## Mismatch Detection

### Flag Says No, Content Is Explicit
```
⚠️ MISMATCH: Track contains explicit content but Explicit flag is "No"
ACTION: Set Explicit: Yes in track file
```

### Flag Says Yes, Content Is Clean
```
i️ NOTE: Track flagged explicit but no explicit words found
This is OK - artist may want explicit flag for themes/context
No action required (conservative flagging is fine)
```

---

## Distributor Requirements

Most distributors (DistroKid, TuneCore, CD Baby) require:
- **Track-level flags**: Each track marked explicit or clean
- **Album-level flag**: If ANY track is explicit, album is explicit
- **Consistent metadata**: Flag must match actual content

**Consequences of wrong flags**:
- Explicit content marked clean → Potential removal from platforms, account issues
- Clean content marked explicit → Reduced reach (filtered from some playlists) but no penalty

**Rule**: When in doubt, mark explicit. Under-flagging is worse than over-flagging.

---

## Integration

This skill is called during:
1. **Ready to Generate Checkpoint** - Before Suno generation
2. **Album Completion Checklist** - Before release
3. **Manual review** - Anytime with `/explicit-checker [path]`

---

## Example Invocations

```
/explicit-checker artists/[artist]/albums/rock/dark-tide/
/explicit-checker artists/[artist]/albums/rock/dark-tide/tracks/01-the-tank.md
```

---

## Remember

- Case-insensitive matching (Fuck = fuck = FUCK)
- Check variations (fucking, fucked, fucker)
- Phonetic spellings count (fuk, sh1t if intentional)
- Context matters less than presence - if the word is there, flag it
- Album is explicit if ANY track is explicit
- **Override additions** - Add artist/genre-specific explicit words
- **Override removals** - Remove words for specific contexts (historical, literary)

Excerpt, first 5,160 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 3e049bf

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
git -C claude-ai-music-skills checkout 3e049bfcc994

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 3e049bfcc994 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 3e049bfcc994

Similar skills

Questions about Explicit Checker

What does the Explicit Checker skill do?
Human + AI music production workflow for Suno - skills, templates, and tools
Is Explicit Checker safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Explicit Checker access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (3e049bfcc994), read on 2026-10-31. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.