Agent skill · Audited from source
Explicit Checker
skill · bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skillsCC0-1.0 licenceAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 3e049bfcc994
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 3e049bfcc994 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Explicit Checker (bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/bitwize-music-studio/explicit-checker
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (0)
No findings at any severity. We re-audit when the source changes.
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 3e049bfcc994 · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publisherbitwize-music-studio GitHub organizationOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderbitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills/skills/explicit-checkerThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceCC0-1.0As the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict3e049bfcc994A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 2 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.
---
name: explicit-checker
description: Scans lyrics for explicit content and verifies that explicit flags match actual content. Use before Suno generation or release to ensure accurate content ratings.
argument-hint: <album-path or track-path>
model: sonnet
effort: medium
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Glob
- Grep
- bitwize-music-mcp
---
## Your Task
**Path to scan**: $ARGUMENTS
1. Scan all lyrics for explicit words
2. Report findings with word counts per track
3. Flag mismatches (explicit content but flag says No, or vice versa)
4. Provide summary suitable for distributor submission
---
# Explicit Content Checker
You scan lyrics for explicit content to ensure proper flagging before release.
---
## Explicit Words (Require Explicit = Yes)
These words and variations require the explicit flag:
| Category | Words |
|----------|-------|
| **F-word** | fuck, fucking, fucked, fucker, motherfuck, motherfucker |
| **S-word** | shit, shitting, shitty, bullshit |
| **B-word** | bitch, bitches |
| **C-words** | cunt, cock, cocks |
| **D-word** | dick, dicks |
| **P-word** | pussy, pussies |
| **A-word** | asshole, assholes |
| **Slurs** | whore, slut, n-word, f-word (slur) |
| **Profanity** | goddamn, goddammit |
---
## Clean Words (No Explicit Flag Needed)
These are acceptable without explicit flag:
- damn, hell, crap, ass, bastard, piss
Note: "damn" alone is clean, but "goddamn" is explicit.
---
## Override Support
The MCP `check_explicit_content` tool automatically loads and merges user overrides from `{overrides}/explicit-words.md`. No manual config read or merge logic needed — pass lyrics text and get results with overrides applied.
### Override File Format
**`{overrides}/explicit-words.md`:**
```markdown
# Custom Explicit Words
## Additional Explicit Words
- slang-term
- regional-profanity
- artist-specific-explicit
## Not Explicit (Override Base)
- hell (context: historical/literary)
- damn (context: emphasis)
```
---
## Workflow
### For Album Path
1. Call `list_tracks(album_slug)` — get all tracks with metadata
2. For each track:
- Call `extract_section(album_slug, track_slug, "lyrics")` — get lyrics text
- Call `check_explicit_content(lyrics_text)` — returns matches with line numbers (overrides auto-merged)
- Get Explicit flag from track metadata
- Compare flag vs. content
3. Generate report
### For Single Track
1. Call `extract_section(album_slug, track_slug, "lyrics")` — get lyrics text
2. Call `check_explicit_content(lyrics_text)` — scan for explicit words
3. Get Explicit flag from track metadata via `get_track(album_slug, track_slug)`
4. Report findings
---
## Output Format
```
EXPLICIT CONTENT SCAN
Album: [Album Name]
Date: [Scan Date]
TRACK RESULTS:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Track 01: [Title]
Flag: No
Content: Clean
Status: ✓ OK
Track 02: [Title]
Flag: Yes
Content: fuck (3), shit (2), bitch (1)
Status: ✓ OK (flag matches content)
Track 03: [Title]
Flag: No
Content: fuck (1)
Status: ⚠️ MISMATCH - Contains explicit content but flag is No
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
SUMMARY:
Total tracks: 10
Clean tracks: 7
Explicit tracks: 3
Mismatches: 1
ALBUM EXPLICIT FLAG: Yes (any track explicit = album explicit)
ACTION REQUIRED:
- Track 03: Set Explicit flag to Yes
```
---
## Mismatch Detection
### Flag Says No, Content Is Explicit
```
⚠️ MISMATCH: Track contains explicit content but Explicit flag is "No"
ACTION: Set Explicit: Yes in track file
```
### Flag Says Yes, Content Is Clean
```
i️ NOTE: Track flagged explicit but no explicit words found
This is OK - artist may want explicit flag for themes/context
No action required (conservative flagging is fine)
```
---
## Distributor Requirements
Most distributors (DistroKid, TuneCore, CD Baby) require:
- **Track-level flags**: Each track marked explicit or clean
- **Album-level flag**: If ANY track is explicit, album is explicit
- **Consistent metadata**: Flag must match actual content
**Consequences of wrong flags**:
- Explicit content marked clean → Potential removal from platforms, account issues
- Clean content marked explicit → Reduced reach (filtered from some playlists) but no penalty
**Rule**: When in doubt, mark explicit. Under-flagging is worse than over-flagging.
---
## Integration
This skill is called during:
1. **Ready to Generate Checkpoint** - Before Suno generation
2. **Album Completion Checklist** - Before release
3. **Manual review** - Anytime with `/explicit-checker [path]`
---
## Example Invocations
```
/explicit-checker artists/[artist]/albums/rock/dark-tide/
/explicit-checker artists/[artist]/albums/rock/dark-tide/tracks/01-the-tank.md
```
---
## Remember
- Case-insensitive matching (Fuck = fuck = FUCK)
- Check variations (fucking, fucked, fucker)
- Phonetic spellings count (fuk, sh1t if intentional)
- Context matters less than presence - if the word is there, flag it
- Album is explicit if ANY track is explicit
- **Override additions** - Add artist/genre-specific explicit words
- **Override removals** - Remove words for specific contexts (historical, literary)Excerpt, first 5,160 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 3e049bf
git clone https://github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills git -C claude-ai-music-skills checkout 3e049bfcc994
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 3e049bfcc994 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
3e049bfcc994
Similar skills
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Searches and retrieves documents from free public sources using automated browser navigation. Use when research needs primary source documents like court filings, government reports, or public records.
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Shows available skills, common workflows, and quick reference for the plugin. Use when the user asks for help, what skills are available, or how to do something.
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Places album art files in the correct audio and content directory locations. Use when the user has generated or downloaded album artwork that needs to be saved.
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Moves audio files to the correct album location with proper path structure. Use when the user has downloaded WAV files from Suno or other sources that need to be organized.
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Moves track markdown files to the correct album location. Use when the user has track files in Downloads or other locations that need to be placed in an album.
bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills
Sets up or edits the plugin configuration file interactively. Use on first-time setup, when config is missing, or when the user wants to change settings.
Questions about Explicit Checker
What does the Explicit Checker skill do?
Is Explicit Checker safe to install?
What can Explicit Checker access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/bitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skills/tree/main — the audited source at commit 3e049bfcc994 and every finding aboveObserved · 31 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Explicit Checker skill do?
- Is Explicit Checker safe to install?
- What can Explicit Checker access on my machine?