Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Nemotron 3 Super is about 1.1× cheaper on input ($0.09 against $0.09 per 1M tokens) and on output. Nemotron 3 Super has the larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $74.25 a month for Nemotron 3 Super and $140 for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/nvidia/nemotron-3-super-120b-a12b/vs/qwen/3-next-80b-a3b-instruct
Model A
by NVIDIA · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.09
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.09
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nemotron 3 Super Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct (B4) sits 1 context band smaller than Nemotron 3 Super (B5).
Same square as Nemotron 3 Super: Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ($0.05), Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07). Same square as Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct: Gemma 4 26B A4B ($0.02), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ($0.06), Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ($0.09). Open B5 · Open B4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Gemma 4 26B A4B |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Nemotron 3 Super, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), Qwen3.5-Flash, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, Qwen3.7 Flash |
| GRIDC4 | $0.10–0.30 | 256K–1M | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nemotron 3 Super if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.09 per 1M input against $0.09
- output dominates your bill: $0.40 per 1M output against $1.10
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 262,144
Choose Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct over Nemotron 3 Super. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nemotron 3 Super
By NVIDIA. $0.09 input and $0.40 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.09 input and $1.10 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nemotron 3 Super with…
Compare Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?