Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026
Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is about 1.9× cheaper on input ($0.35 against $0.66 per 1M tokens) and on output. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has the larger context window (128K against 33K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $208 a month for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and $387 for Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/mistralai/mistral-small-3-1-24b-instruct/vs/qwen/2-5-coder-32b-instruct
Model A
by Mistral AI · weights not marked open · GRIDD2
$0.35
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD2
$0.66
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Mistral Small 3.1 24B and Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct share D2.
Same square as Mistral Small 3.1 24B: MiniMax M2-her ($0.30), Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ($0.30), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.36). Open D2
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD2 | $0.30–1 | 32–128K | Mistral Small 3.1 24B, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), MiniMax M2-her, WizardLM-2 8x22B, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Mistral Small 3.1 24B if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.35 per 1M input against $0.66
- output dominates your bill: $0.56 per 1M output against $1.00
- your prompts are long: it takes 128,000 tokens against 32,768
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct over Mistral Small 3.1 24B. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
By Mistral AI. $0.35 input and $0.56 output per 1M tokens, 128K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.66 input and $1.00 output per 1M tokens, 33K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with…
- Gemma 2 27B$0.65
- GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.50
- MiniMax M2-her$0.30
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct$0.36
- All alternatives →
Compare Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?