Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026
Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Mistral Small 3.1 24B is about 1.4× cheaper on input ($0.35 against $0.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Mistral Small 3.1 24B has the larger context window (128K against 16K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $208 a month for Mistral Small 3.1 24B and $360 for GPT-3.5 Turbo.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Mistral Small 3.1 24B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/mistralai/mistral-small-3-1-24b-instruct/vs/openai/gpt-3-5-turbo
Model A
by Mistral AI · weights not marked open · GRIDD2
$0.35
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Mistral Small 3.1 24B GPT-3.5 Turbo · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. GPT-3.5 Turbo (D1) sits 1 context band smaller than Mistral Small 3.1 24B (D2).
Same square as Mistral Small 3.1 24B: MiniMax M2-her ($0.30), Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) ($0.30), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.36). Same square as GPT-3.5 Turbo: Gemma 2 27B ($0.65). Open D2 · Open D1
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD1 | $0.30–1 | <32K | GPT-3.5 Turbo, Gemma 2 27B |
| GRIDD2 | $0.30–1 | 32–128K | Mistral Small 3.1 24B, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), MiniMax M2-her, WizardLM-2 8x22B, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Mistral Small 3.1 24B if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.35 per 1M input against $0.50
- output dominates your bill: $0.56 per 1M output against $1.50
- your prompts are long: it takes 128,000 tokens against 16,385
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo if…
- work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than GPT-3.5 Turbo?
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-3.5 Turbo?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Mistral Small 3.1 24B
By Mistral AI. $0.35 input and $0.56 output per 1M tokens, 128K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →GPT-3.5 Turbo
By OpenAI. $0.50 input and $1.50 output per 1M tokens, 16K context, atlas square D1. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Mistral Small 3.1 24B with…
Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Mistral Small 3.1 24B better than GPT-3.5 Turbo?
- Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.1 24B or GPT-3.5 Turbo?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?