Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026

MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.15 against $0.19 per 1M tokens) and on output. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $122 a month for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and $186 for Qwen3.6 Flash.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
CoCopilotAIGoogle AI Mode
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “MiniMax M3.1 Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/minimax/m3-1/vs/qwen/3-6

Model A

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

by MiniMax · weights not marked open · GRIDC5

Input / 1M
$0.15
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
2 Nov 2026
Output / 1M$0.60
Context1.05M
vs

Model B

Qwen3.6 Flash

by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC5

Input / 1M
$0.19
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026
Output / 1M$1.13
Context1M

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash
Input / 1M tokens
$0.15
$0.19
Output / 1M tokens
$0.60
$1.13
Batch input / output
Not listed
Not listed
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000
Input types
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Tiers listed
standard
standard
Prices checked
2026-11-02
2026-08-17

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$122/mo
$186/mo
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$126/mo
$169/mo
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$124/mo
$182/mo

MiniMax M3.1 Flash   Qwen3.6 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. MiniMax M3.1 Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share C5.

Same square as MiniMax M3.1 Flash: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10). Open C5

AFreeB<$0.10C$0.10–0.30D$0.30–1E$1–3F$3–10G$10–30H$30+1<32K232–128K3128–256K4256K–1M51M6>1MINPUT PRICE PER 1M TOKENS →CONTEXT WINDOW ↑ · position within a square follows the real valueNemotron 3.5 Super VL · C5Qwen3.8 Flash · C5Qwen3.8 27B · C5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash · C5MiniMax-01 · C5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp · C5MiniMax M3.1 FlashMiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.6 FlashQwen3.6 Flash
MiniMax M3.1 FlashQwen3.6 FlashNearest neighboursOpen weights
View the map as a table (1 squares)
SquarePrice bandContext bandModels
GRIDC5$0.10–0.301MMiniMax M3.1 Flash, Qwen3.6 Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 27B, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash
Vision input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Audio input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Open weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Batch tier
Not listed
Not listed
Free tier
Not listed
Not listed
Thinking tier
Not listed
Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash if…

  • you pay by the token: it costs $0.15 per 1M input against $0.19
  • output dominates your bill: $0.60 per 1M output against $1.13
  • your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000

Choose Qwen3.6 Flash if…

Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.6 Flash over MiniMax M3.1 Flash. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is MiniMax M3.1 Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: MiniMax M3.1 Flash is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.15 against $0.19 per 1M tokens) and on output. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $122 a month for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and $186 for Qwen3.6 Flash. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M3.1 Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: $0.15 against $0.19 per 1M input tokens, and $0.60 against $1.13 per 1M output, on standard pricing.
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: $0.15 input and $0.60 output. Qwen3.6 Flash: $0.19 input and $1.13 output. Standard tier, USD.
Which has the larger context window?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash, with 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3.6 Flash has 1,000,000 tokens.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.
Can both read images or audio?
Input types recorded for MiniMax M3.1 Flash: none recorded. For Qwen3.6 Flash: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.
Is either model open-weight?
MiniMax M3.1 Flash: not marked open-weight in our records. Qwen3.6 Flash: not marked open-weight in our records.
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $122 a month for MiniMax M3.1 Flash and $186 for Qwen3.6 Flash. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

By MiniMax. $0.15 input and $0.60 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Qwen3.6 Flash

By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.19 input and $1.13 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.