Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor is about 1.5× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.15 per 1M tokens) and on output. Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $63.00 a month for Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor and $110 for Qwen3.8 Omni Flash.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/meta/muse-spark-1-2-contributor/vs/qwen/3-8-omni
Model A
by Meta · weights not marked open · GRIDC5
$0.10
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 1 Sep 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDC5
$0.15
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor Qwen3.8 Omni Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor and Qwen3.8 Omni Flash share C5.
Same square as Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10), Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15). Open C5
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC5 | $0.10–0.30 | 1M | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, Claude Haiku 5.5, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, Qwen3.8 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.10 per 1M input against $0.15
- output dominates your bill: $0.20 per 1M output against $0.47
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.8 Omni Flash over Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor better than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor
By Meta. $0.10 input and $0.20 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.15 input and $0.47 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor with…
Compare Qwen3.8 Omni Flash with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor better than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
- Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?