Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.20 against $0.25 per 1M tokens) and on output. GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $248 a month for Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and $198 for GPT-5.6 Luna.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-5.6 Luna”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-3-1-flash/vs/openai/gpt-5-6-luna
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDC5
$0.25
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite GPT-5.6 Luna · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. GPT-5.6 Luna (C6) sits 1 context band larger than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (C5).
Same square as Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10). Same square as GPT-5.6 Luna: GPT-6 Luna ($0.10), Llama 4 Scout ($0.10). Open C5 · Open C6
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC5 | $0.10–0.30 | 1M | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, Qwen-Plus, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, MiniMax-01, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax M3.1 Flash |
| GRIDC6 | $0.10–0.30 | >1M | GPT-5.6 Luna, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-6 Luna |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite over GPT-5.6 Luna. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Google.
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.20 per 1M input against $0.25
- output dominates your bill: $1.20 per 1M output against $1.50
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,050,000 tokens against 1,048,576
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.6 Luna?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
By Google. $0.25 input and $1.50 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →GPT-5.6 Luna
By OpenAI. $0.20 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C6. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite with…
Compare GPT-5.6 Luna with…
- Llama 4 Scout$0.10
- GPT-6 Luna$0.10
- MiniMax-01$0.20
- Qwen3.6 Flash$0.19
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
- Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or GPT-5.6 Luna?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?