Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is about 1.1× cheaper on input ($0.45 against $0.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Qwen3.6 27B has the larger context window (262K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $495 a month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and $446 for Qwen3.6 27B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.6 27B”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-3-1-flash-image/vs/qwen/3-6-27b
Model A
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · open weights · GRIDD4
$0.45
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Qwen3.6 27B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.6 27B (D4) sits 1 context band larger than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (D3).
Same square as Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Codestral 2508 ($0.30), Command A+ ($0.30), MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30). Same square as Qwen3.6 27B: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ($0.30), Devstral 2 2512 ($0.40), Qwen3.5 397B A17B ($0.50). Open D3 · Open D4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), R1 0528, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3, Mistral Medium 3.1, Command A+, Muse Glimmer 30B |
| GRIDD4 | $0.30–1 | 256K–1M | Qwen3.6 27B, Qwen3.5 397B A17B, Devstral 2 2512, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| GRIDD5 | $0.30–1 | 1M | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) over Qwen3.6 27B. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Google.
Choose Qwen3.6 27B if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.45 per 1M input against $0.50
- output dominates your bill: $2.70 per 1M output against $3.00
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 131,072
- you want open weights, so you can run the model yourself
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen3.6 27B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.50 input and $3.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.6 27B
By Qwen (Alibaba), open weights. $0.45 input and $2.70 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square D4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with…
Compare Qwen3.6 27B with…
- Devstral 2 2512$0.40
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.30
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.50
- R1 0528$0.50
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Qwen3.6 27B?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen3.6 27B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?