Model comparison · Updated 1 Sep 2026
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B is about 1.7× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 131K-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $495 a month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and $243 for Muse Glimmer 30B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Muse Glimmer 30B”. Retrieved 1 Sep 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-3-1-flash-image/vs/meta/muse-glimmer-30b
Model A
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Muse Glimmer 30B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and Muse Glimmer 30B share D3.
Same square as Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Codestral 2508 ($0.30), Command A+ ($0.30), MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30). Open D3
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), Muse Glimmer 30B, R1 0528, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3, Mistral Medium 3.1, Command A+, MiniMax M2.1, MiniMax M2.7, Codestral 2508 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) over Muse Glimmer 30B. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Google.
Choose Muse Glimmer 30B if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.30 per 1M input against $0.50
- output dominates your bill: $1.20 per 1M output against $3.00
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Muse Glimmer 30B?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Muse Glimmer 30B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.50 input and $3.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Muse Glimmer 30B
By Meta. $0.30 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with…
Compare Muse Glimmer 30B with…
- Codestral 2508$0.30
- Command A+$0.30
- Llama 3.1 70B Instruct$0.40
- MiniMax M2.1$0.30
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Muse Glimmer 30B?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Muse Glimmer 30B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?