Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is about 2.7× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.80 per 1M tokens), though Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is cheaper on output. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has the larger context window (128K against 33K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $360 a month for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and $450 for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-2-5-flash-image/vs/qwen/2-5-vl-72b-instruct
Model A
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD2
$0.30
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD2
$0.80
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct share D2.
Same square as Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): MiniMax M2-her ($0.30), Mistral Small 3.1 24B ($0.35), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.36). Open D2
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD2 | $0.30–1 | 32–128K | Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image), Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct, MiniMax M2-her, Mistral Small 3.1 24B, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct, WizardLM-2 8x22B, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.30 per 1M input against $0.80
Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct if…
- output dominates your bill: $1.00 per 1M output against $2.50
- your prompts are long: it takes 128,000 tokens against 32,768
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.30 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens, 33K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.80 input and $1.00 output per 1M tokens, 128K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) with…
Compare Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct with…
- Gemma 2 27B$0.65
- GPT-3.5 Turbo$0.50
- MiniMax M2-her$0.30
- Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.35
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?