Model comparison · Updated 17 Aug 2026

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is about 2.1× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.62 per 1M tokens), though WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper on output. WizardLM-2 8x22B has the larger context window (66K against 33K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $360 a month for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and $335 for WizardLM-2 8x22B.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) vs WizardLM-2 8x22B”. Retrieved 17 Aug 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-2-5-flash-image/vs/microsoft/wizardlm-2-8x22b

Model A

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD2

Input / 1M
$0.30
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026
Output / 1M$2.50
Context33K
vs

Model B

WizardLM-2 8x22B

by Microsoft · weights not marked open · GRIDD2

Input / 1M
$0.62
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026
Output / 1M$0.62
Context66K

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Input / 1M tokens
$0.30
$0.62
Output / 1M tokens
$2.50
$0.62
Batch input / output
Not listed
Not listed
Context window
32,768
65,535
Input types
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Tiers listed
standard
standard
Prices checked
2026-08-17
2026-08-17

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$360/mo
$335/mo
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$291/mo
$465/mo
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$342/mo
$379/mo

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)   WizardLM-2 8x22B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and WizardLM-2 8x22B share D2.

Same square as Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): MiniMax M2-her ($0.30), Mistral Small 3.1 24B ($0.35), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.36). Open D2

AFreeB<$0.10C$0.10–0.30D$0.30–1E$1–3F$3–10G$10–30H$30+1<32K232–128K3128–256K4256K–1M51M6>1MINPUT PRICE PER 1M TOKENS →CONTEXT WINDOW ↑ · position within a square follows the real valueMiniMax M2-her · D2Mistral Small 3.1 24B · D2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct · D2Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct · D2Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct · D2Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)WizardLM-2 8x22BWizardLM-2 8x22B
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)WizardLM-2 8x22BNearest neighboursOpen weights
View the map as a table (1 squares)

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Vision input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Audio input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Open weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Batch tier
Not listed
Not listed
Free tier
Not listed
Not listed
Thinking tier
Not listed
Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) if…

  • you pay by the token: it costs $0.30 per 1M input against $0.62

Choose WizardLM-2 8x22B if…

  • output dominates your bill: $0.62 per 1M output against $2.50
  • your prompts are long: it takes 65,535 tokens against 32,768

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?
We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) is about 2.1× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.62 per 1M tokens), though WizardLM-2 8x22B is cheaper on output. WizardLM-2 8x22B has the larger context window (66K against 33K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $360 a month for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and $335 for WizardLM-2 8x22B. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) or WizardLM-2 8x22B?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): $0.30 against $0.62 per 1M input tokens, and $2.50 against $0.62 per 1M output, on standard pricing.
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): $0.30 input and $2.50 output. WizardLM-2 8x22B: $0.62 input and $0.62 output. Standard tier, USD.
Which has the larger context window?
WizardLM-2 8x22B, with 65,535 tokens. Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) has 32,768 tokens.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.
Can both read images or audio?
Input types recorded for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): none recorded. For WizardLM-2 8x22B: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.
Is either model open-weight?
Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image): not marked open-weight in our records. WizardLM-2 8x22B: not marked open-weight in our records.
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $360 a month for Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) and $335 for WizardLM-2 8x22B. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

By Google. $0.30 input and $2.50 output per 1M tokens, 33K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

WizardLM-2 8x22B

By Microsoft. $0.62 input and $0.62 output per 1M tokens, 66K context, atlas square D2. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Compare Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) with…

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.