Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna is about 1.1× cheaper on input ($0.20 against $0.22 per 1M tokens), though DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper on output. GPT-5.6 Luna has the larger context window (1.05M against 1.05M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $155 a month for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp and $198 for GPT-5.6 Luna.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp vs GPT-5.6 Luna”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/deepseek/v4-flash-vision-exp/vs/openai/gpt-5-6-luna
Model A
by DeepSeek · weights not marked open · GRIDC5
$0.22
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp GPT-5.6 Luna · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. GPT-5.6 Luna (C6) sits 1 context band larger than DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp (C5).
Same square as DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: Claude Haiku 5.5 ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10). Same square as GPT-5.6 Luna: GPT-6 Luna ($0.10), Llama 4 Scout ($0.10). Open C5 · Open C6
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC5 | $0.10–0.30 | 1M | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, MiniMax-01, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview, Qwen-Plus |
| GRIDC6 | $0.10–0.30 | >1M | GPT-5.6 Luna, Llama 4 Scout, GPT-6 Luna |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.65 per 1M output against $1.20
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.20 per 1M input against $0.22
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,050,000 tokens against 1,048,576
- work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.6 Luna?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
By DeepSeek. $0.22 input and $0.65 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →GPT-5.6 Luna
By OpenAI. $0.20 input and $1.20 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C6. Tiers listed: batch, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp with…
- MiniMax-01$0.20
- Llama 4 Maverick$0.19
- Qwen3.6 Flash$0.19
- Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite$0.25
- All alternatives →
Compare GPT-5.6 Luna with…
- Llama 4 Scout$0.10
- GPT-6 Luna$0.10
- MiniMax-01$0.20
- Llama 4 Maverick$0.19
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp better than GPT-5.6 Luna?
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp or GPT-5.6 Luna?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?