Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is about 1.2× cheaper on input ($0.22 against $0.27 per 1M tokens) and on output. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has the larger context window (164K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $212 a month for DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and $144 for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/deepseek/v3-1-terminus/vs/meta/llama-3-3-70b-instruct
Model A
by DeepSeek · weights not marked open · GRIDC3
$0.27
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct share C3.
Same square as DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: Ministral 3 3B 2512 ($0.10), Llama Guard 4 12B ($0.18), Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ($0.20). Open C3
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDC3 | $0.10–0.30 | 128–256K | DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, MiniMax M2.5, DeepSeek V3.2, DeepSeek V3 0324, DeepSeek V3.1, MiniMax M2.7, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety, Llama Guard 4 12B |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…
- your prompts are long: it takes 163,840 tokens against 131,072
Choose Llama 3.3 70B Instruct if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.22 per 1M input against $0.27
- output dominates your bill: $0.50 per 1M output against $1.00
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
By DeepSeek. $0.27 input and $1.00 output per 1M tokens, 164K context, atlas square C3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
By Meta. $0.22 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square C3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus with…
- DeepSeek V3 0324$0.29
- DeepSeek V3.1$0.25
- MiniMax M2.5$0.27
- DeepSeek V3.2$0.26
- All alternatives →
Compare Llama 3.3 70B Instruct with…
- DeepSeek V3 0324$0.29
- DeepSeek V3.1$0.25
- DeepSeek V3.2$0.26
- MiniMax M2.7$0.21
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus better than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?