Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Command A+ vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
Command A+ and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B cost the same on input, $0.30 per 1M tokens. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B has the larger context window (262K against 192K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $270 a month for Command A+ and $225 for Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Command A+ vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/cohere/command-a-plus/vs/qwen/3-coder
Model A
by Cohere · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.30
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD4
$0.30
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Command A+ Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (D4) sits 1 context band larger than Command A+ (D3).
Same square as Command A+: Codestral 2508 ($0.30), MiniMax M2 ($0.30), MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30). Same square as Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: Qwen3.6 27B ($0.32), Devstral 2 2512 ($0.40), Qwen3.5 397B A17B ($0.55). Open D3 · Open D4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Command A+, Muse Glimmer 30B, MiniMax M2, MiniMax M2.1, Codestral 2508, DeepSeek V3, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct |
| GRIDD4 | $0.30–1 | 256K–1M | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, Qwen3.6 27B, Devstral 2 2512, Qwen3.5 397B A17B |
| GRIDD5 | $0.30–1 | 1M | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Command A+ if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Command A+ over Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Cohere.
Choose Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B if…
- output dominates your bill: $1.00 per 1M output against $1.50
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 192,000
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Command A+ better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Command A+
By Cohere. $0.30 input and $1.50 output per 1M tokens, 192K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.30 input and $1.00 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square D4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Command A+ with…
- Codestral 2508$0.30
- Muse Glimmer 30B$0.30
- MiniMax M2$0.30
- MiniMax M2.1$0.30
- All alternatives →
Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B with…
- Devstral 2 2512$0.40
- Qwen3.6 27B$0.32
- Qwen3.5 397B A17B$0.55
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash$0.30
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Command A+ better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
- Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?