Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
Command A+ is about 1.7× cheaper on input ($0.30 against $0.50 per 1M tokens) and on output. Command A+ has the larger context window (192K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $270 a month for Command A+ and $495 for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image).
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Command A+ vs Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/cohere/command-a-plus/vs/google/gemini-3-1-flash-image
Model A
by Cohere · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.30
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Command A+ Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
Same square. Command A+ and Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) share D3.
Same square as Command A+: Codestral 2508 ($0.30), MiniMax M2 ($0.30), MiniMax M2.1 ($0.30). Open D3
View the map as a table (1 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Command A+, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), Muse Glimmer 30B, MiniMax M2, MiniMax M2.1, Codestral 2508, DeepSeek V3, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3, Mistral Medium 3.1, R1 0528 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Command A+ if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.30 per 1M input against $0.50
- output dominates your bill: $1.50 per 1M output against $3.00
- your prompts are long: it takes 192,000 tokens against 131,072
Choose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) over Command A+. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Google.
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Command A+ better than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Command A+
By Cohere. $0.30 input and $1.50 output per 1M tokens, 192K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.50 input and $3.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Command A+ with…
- Codestral 2508$0.30
- Muse Glimmer 30B$0.30
- MiniMax M2$0.30
- MiniMax M2.1$0.30
- All alternatives →
Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Command A+ better than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
- Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?