Live survey286 models · 13 providers · 17,592 auditsAudited Using Git Worktrees · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Claude Haiku 5.5 is about 1.9× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.19 per 1M tokens) and on output. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $90.00 a month for Claude Haiku 5.5 and $143 for Llama 4 Maverick.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
CoCopilotAIGoogle AI Mode
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 4 Maverick”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/anthropic/claude-haiku-5-5/vs/meta/llama-4-maverick

Model A

Claude Haiku 5.5

by Anthropic · weights not marked open · GRIDC5

Input / 1M
$0.10
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
10 Oct 2026
Output / 1M$0.50
Context1M
vs

Model B

Llama 4 Maverick

by Meta · weights not marked open · GRIDC5

Input / 1M
$0.19
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
10 Oct 2026
Output / 1M$0.65
Context1.05M

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Claude Haiku 5.5
Llama 4 Maverick
Input / 1M tokens
$0.10
$0.19
Output / 1M tokens
$0.50
$0.65
Batch input / output
$0.05 / $0.25
Not listed
Context window
1,000,000
1,048,576
Input types
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Tiers listed
batch, standard
standard
Prices checked
2026-10-10
2026-10-10

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$90.00/mo
$143/mo
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$87.00/mo
$155/mo
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$90.00/mo
$148/mo

Claude Haiku 5.5   Llama 4 Maverick · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. Claude Haiku 5.5 and Llama 4 Maverick share C5.

Same square as Claude Haiku 5.5: Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor ($0.10), Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor ($0.10), Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15). Open C5

AFreeB<$0.10C$0.10–0.30D$0.30–1E$1–3F$3–10G$10–30H$30+1<32K232–128K3128–256K4256K–1M51M6>1MINPUT PRICE PER 1M TOKENS →CONTEXT WINDOW ↑ · position within a square follows the real valueMuse Spark 1.2 Contributor · C5Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor · C5Qwen3.8 Flash · C5Qwen3.8 Omni Flash · C5Qwen3.6 Flash · C5MiniMax-01 · C5DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp · C5Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite · C5Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 MaverickLlama 4 Maverick
Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 MaverickNearest neighboursOpen weights
View the map as a table (1 squares)
SquarePrice bandContext bandModels
GRIDC5$0.10–0.301MClaude Haiku 5.5, Llama 4 Maverick, Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor, Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor, Qwen3.8 Flash, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash, Qwen3.6 Flash, MiniMax-01, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Claude Haiku 5.5
Llama 4 Maverick
Vision input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Audio input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Open weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Batch tier
Supported
Not listed
Free tier
Not listed
Not listed
Thinking tier
Not listed
Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Claude Haiku 5.5 if…

  • you pay by the token: it costs $0.10 per 1M input against $0.19
  • output dominates your bill: $0.50 per 1M output against $0.65
  • work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if…

  • your prompts are long: it takes 1,048,576 tokens against 1,000,000

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Claude Haiku 5.5 better than Llama 4 Maverick?
We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Claude Haiku 5.5 is about 1.9× cheaper on input ($0.10 against $0.19 per 1M tokens) and on output. Llama 4 Maverick has the larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $90.00 a month for Claude Haiku 5.5 and $143 for Llama 4 Maverick. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.
Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Llama 4 Maverick?
Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 against $0.19 per 1M input tokens, and $0.50 against $0.65 per 1M output, on standard pricing.
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Claude Haiku 5.5: $0.10 input and $0.50 output. Llama 4 Maverick: $0.19 input and $0.65 output. Standard tier, USD.
Which has the larger context window?
Llama 4 Maverick, with 1,048,576 tokens. Claude Haiku 5.5 has 1,000,000 tokens.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Claude Haiku 5.5 lists a batch tier, at 50% of its standard price. Llama 4 Maverick lists no batch tier.
Can both read images or audio?
Input types recorded for Claude Haiku 5.5: none recorded. For Llama 4 Maverick: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.
Is either model open-weight?
Claude Haiku 5.5: not marked open-weight in our records. Llama 4 Maverick: not marked open-weight in our records.
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $90.00 a month for Claude Haiku 5.5 and $143 for Llama 4 Maverick. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Claude Haiku 5.5

By Anthropic. $0.10 input and $0.50 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: batch, standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Llama 4 Maverick

By Meta. $0.19 input and $0.65 output per 1M tokens, 1.05M context, atlas square C5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.