Provider comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Meta vs Qwen (Alibaba)
23 models vs 80 models
Meta is cheaper at the median: $0.18 against $0.19 per 1M input tokens across paid models. Its cheapest paid model, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ($0.03), compares with Qwen3.7 Flash ($0.03) at Qwen (Alibaba). Meta lists 23 models; Qwen (Alibaba) lists 80 models.
Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Meta vs Qwen (Alibaba)”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare-providers/meta/qwen
At a glance
Standard tier, paid models · highlighted = better
Meta
Qwen (Alibaba)
Models listed
23
80
Cheapest input / 1M
$0.03
$0.03
Median in / out
$0.18 / $0.37
$0.19 / $0.80
Highest input / 1M
$1.25
$4.00
Largest context
1.31M
1.05M
Batch-tier models
0 of 23
0 of 80
Open-weight models
9
40
Free models
0
0
Costs for real workloads
Cheapest paid model from each provider that fits the job · monthly
Derived from standard-tier prices, 30 days. “Fits the job” means the context window holds the prompt and reply. Excludes batch and caching.
Cheapest model for each capability
Input / output per 1M
| Capability | Meta | Qwen (Alibaba) |
|---|---|---|
| 1M context | Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.10 / $0.20 | Qwen3.7 Flash $0.03 / $0.13 |
| Open weights | None listed | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.10 / $0.20 |
| Extended thinking | None listed | Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.09 / $0.55 |
Line-up by price tier
Paid models · input per 1M
| Tier | Meta | Qwen (Alibaba) |
|---|---|---|
| Flagship $3+ | None listed | Qwen3.8 Max Prime $4.00 |
| Mid $0.50–$3 | Muse Spark 1.1 $1.25 Muse Spark 1.2 $1.25 Muse Spark 1.3 $1.25 | Qwen3.5 397B A17B $0.55 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct $0.66 Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $0.80 Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $2.00 |
| Budget under $0.50 | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct $0.03 Llama 3.1 8B Instruct $0.05 Llama 3.2 3B Instruct $0.05 Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor $0.10 Muse Spark 1.3 Contributor $0.10 +6 more | Qwen3.7 Flash $0.03 Qwen3.5-Flash $0.07 Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.07 Qwen3 32B $0.08 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B $0.08 +25 more |
| Open weights any price | None listed | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct $0.10 Qwen3.6 35B A3B $0.10 Qwen3 14B $0.12 Qwen3 VL 8B Instruct $0.25 Qwen3.6 27B $0.32 |
Questions
Is Meta or Qwen (Alibaba) cheaper?
Meta at the median: $0.18 against $0.19 for Qwen (Alibaba) per 1M input tokens. Median is across each provider's paid standard-tier models, so a provider with many small models can look cheaper than its flagship is.
Which provider has more models?
Qwen (Alibaba) lists more: Meta 23, Qwen (Alibaba) 80. Counts are models with a page in our catalogue.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Meta: no batch tier listed. Qwen (Alibaba): no batch tier listed.
Which has the larger context window?
Meta has the larger: Llama 4 Scout (1.31M tokens) at Meta, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (1.05M) at Qwen (Alibaba).
Does either provider offer open-weight models?
Meta: 9 open-weight models. Qwen (Alibaba): 40 open-weight models.
Does either have free models?
Meta: none listed at no per-token charge. Qwen (Alibaba): none.
Browse more providers
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Meta or Qwen (Alibaba) cheaper?
- Which provider has more models?
- Do both offer batch pricing?