Deployment PatternsSAFE
everything-claude-code 中文翻译项目:完整的 Claude Code 配置集合(agents, skills, hooks, commands, rules, MCPs)。源自 Anthropic 黑客松获胜者的实战配置,助力中文工程师高效理解与使用 Claude Code。
Overview
everything-claude-code 中文翻译项目:完整的 Claude Code 配置集合(agents, skills, hooks, commands, rules, MCPs)。源自 Anthropic 黑客松获胜者的实战配置,助力中文工程师高效理解与使用 Claude Code。
012f775295c3OBSERVED · 2026-10-12What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: deployment-patterns
description: 部署工作流、CI/CD流水线模式、Docker容器化、健康检查、回滚策略以及Web应用程序的生产就绪检查清单。
origin: ECC
---
# 部署模式
生产环境部署工作流和 CI/CD 最佳实践。
## 何时启用
* 设置 CI/CD 流水线时
* 将应用容器化(Docker)时
* 规划部署策略(蓝绿、金丝雀、滚动)时
* 实现健康检查和就绪探针时
* 准备生产发布时
* 配置环境特定设置时
## 部署策略
### 滚动部署(默认)
逐步替换实例——在发布过程中,新旧版本同时运行。
```
Instance 1: v1 → v2 (update first)
Instance 2: v1 (still running v1)
Instance 3: v1 (still running v1)
Instance 1: v2
Instance 2: v1 → v2 (update second)
Instance 3: v1
Instance 1: v2
Instance 2: v2
Instance 3: v1 → v2 (update last)
```
**优点:** 零停机时间,渐进式发布
**缺点:** 两个版本同时运行——需要向后兼容的更改
**适用场景:** 标准部署,向后兼容的更改
### 蓝绿部署
运行两个相同的环境。原子化地切换流量。
```
Blue (v1) ← traffic
Green (v2) idle, running new version
# After verification:
Blue (v1) idle (becomes standby)
Green (v2) ← traffic
```
**优点:** 即时回滚(切换回蓝色环境),切换干净利落
**缺点:** 部署期间需要双倍的基础设施
**适用场景:** 关键服务,对问题零容忍
### 金丝雀部署
首先将一小部分流量路由到新版本。
```
v1: 95% of traffic
v2: 5% of traffic (canary)
# If metrics look good:
v1: 50% of traffic
v2: 50% of traffic
# Final:
v2: 100% of traffic
```
**优点:** 在全量发布前,通过真实流量发现问题
**缺点:** 需要流量分割基础设施和监控
**适用场景:** 高流量服务,风险性更改,功能标志
## Docker
### 多阶段 Dockerfile (Node.js)
```dockerfile
# Stage 1: Install dependencies
FROM node:22-alpine AS deps
WORKDIR /app
COPY package.json package-lock.json ./
RUN npm ci --production=false
# Stage 2: Build
FROM node:22-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY --from=deps /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY . .
RUN npm run build
RUN npm prune --production
# Stage 3: Production image
FROM node:22-alpine AS runner
WORKDIR /app
RUN addgroup -g 1001 -S appgroup && adduser -S appuser -u 1001
USER appuser
COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/node_modules ./node_modules
COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/dist ./dist
COPY --from=builder --chown=appuser:appgroup /app/package.json ./
ENV NODE_ENV=production
EXPOSE 3000
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s --start-period=5s --retries=3 \
CMD wget --no-verbose --tries=1 --spider http://localhost:3000/health || exit 1
CMD ["node", "dist/server.js"]
```
### 多阶段 Dockerfile (Go)
```dockerfile
FROM golang:1.22-alpine AS builder
WORKDIR /app
COPY go.mod go.sum ./
RUN go mod download
COPY . .
RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 GOOS=linux go build -ldflags="-s -w" -o /server ./cmd/server
FROM alpine:3.19 AS runner
RUN apk --no-cache add ca-certificates
RUN adduser -D -u 1001 appuser
USER appuser
COPY --from=builder /server /server
EXPOSE 8080
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s CMD wget -qO- http://localhost:8080/health || exit 1
CMD ["/server"]
```
### 多阶段 Dockerfile (Python/Django)
```dockerfile
FROM python:3.12-slim AS builder
WORKDIR /app
RUN pip install --no-cache-dir uv
COPY requirements.txt .
RUN uv pip install --system --no-cache -r requirements.txt
FROM python:3.12-slim AS runner
WORKDIR /app
RUN useradd -r -u 1001 appuser
USER appuser
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages /usr/local/lib/python3.12/site-packages
COPY --from=builder /usr/local/bin /usr/local/bin
COPY . .
ENV PYTHONUNBUFFERED=1
EXPOSE 8000
HEALTHCHECK --interval=30s --timeout=3s CMD python -c "import urllib.request; urllib.request.urlopen('http://localhost:8000/health/')" || exit 1
CMD ["gunicorn", "config.wsgi:application", "--bind", "0.0.0.0:8000", "--workers", "4"]
```
### Docker 最佳实践
```
# GOOD practices
- Use specific version tags (node:22-alpine, not node:latest)
- Multi-stage builds to minimize image size
- Run as non-root user
- Copy dependency files first (layer caching)
- Use .dockerignore to exclude node_modules, .git, tests
- Add HEALTHCHECK instruction
- Set resource limits in docker-compose or k8s
# BAD practices
- Running as root
- Using :latest tags
- Copying entire repo in one COPY layer
- Installing dev dependencies in production image
- Storing secrets in image (use env vars or secrets manager)
```
## CI/CD 流水线
### GitHub Actions (标准流水线)
```yaml
name: CI/CD
on:
push:
branches: [main]
pull_request:
branches: [main]
jobs:
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: 22
cache: npm
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run lint
- run: npm run typecheck
- run: npm test -- --coverage
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: always()
with:
name: coverage
path: coverage/
build:
needs: test
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: docker/setup-buildx-action@v3
- uses: docker/login-action@v3
with:
registry: ghcr.io
username: ${{ github.actor }}
password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
- uses: docker/build-push-action@v5
with:
push: true
tags: ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
cache-from: type=gha
cache-to: type=gha,mode=max
deploy:
needs: build
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
environment: production
steps:
- name: Deploy to production
run: |
# Platform-specific deployment command
# Railway: railway up
# Vercel: vercel --prod
# K8s: kubectl set image deployment/app app=ghcr.io/${{ github.repository }}:${{ github.sha }}
echo "Deploying ${{ github.sha }}"
```
### 流水线阶段
```
PR opened:
lint → typecheck → unit tests → integration tests → preview deploy
Merged to main:
lint → typecheck → unit tests → integration tests → build image → deploy staging → smoke tests → deploy production
```
## 健康检查
### 健康检查端点
```typescript
// Simple health check
app.get("/health", (req, res) => {
res.status(200).json({ status: "ok" });
});
// Detailed health check (for internal monitoring)
app.get("/health/detailed", async (req, res) => {
const checks = {
database: await checkDatabase(),
redis: awaitTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
012f775295c3full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/xu-xiang__deployment-patterns.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-12 | 012f775295c3 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Deployment Patterns skill do?
everything-claude-code 中文翻译项目:完整的 Claude Code 配置集合(agents, skills, hooks, commands, rules, MCPs)。源自 Anthropic 黑客松获胜者的实战配置,助力中文工程师高效理解与使用 Claude Code。
Is Deployment Patterns safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Deployment Patterns access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (012f775295c3), read on 2026-10-12. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.