Data Quality FrameworksSAFE
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
Overview
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
adb71e0b2512OBSERVED · 2026-09-30Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
pip install great_expectations
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: data-quality-frameworks
description: Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts. Use when building data quality pipelines, implementing validation rules, or establishing data contracts.
---
# Data Quality Frameworks
Production patterns for implementing data quality with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts to ensure reliable data pipelines.
## When to Use This Skill
- Implementing data quality checks in pipelines
- Setting up Great Expectations validation
- Building comprehensive dbt test suites
- Establishing data contracts between teams
- Monitoring data quality metrics
- Automating data validation in CI/CD
## Core Concepts
### 1. Data Quality Dimensions
| Dimension | Description | Example Check |
| ---------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------- |
| **Completeness** | No missing values | `expect_column_values_to_not_be_null` |
| **Uniqueness** | No duplicates | `expect_column_values_to_be_unique` |
| **Validity** | Values in expected range | `expect_column_values_to_be_in_set` |
| **Accuracy** | Data matches reality | Cross-reference validation |
| **Consistency** | No contradictions | `expect_column_pair_values_A_to_be_greater_than_B` |
| **Timeliness** | Data is recent | `expect_column_max_to_be_between` |
### 2. Testing Pyramid for Data
```
/\
/ \ Integration Tests (cross-table)
/────\
/ \ Unit Tests (single column)
/────────\
/ \ Schema Tests (structure)
/────────────\
```
## Quick Start
### Great Expectations Setup
```bash
# Install
pip install great_expectations
# Initialize project
great_expectations init
# Create datasource
great_expectations datasource new
```
```python
# great_expectations/checkpoints/daily_validation.yml
import great_expectations as gx
# Create context
context = gx.get_context()
# Create expectation suite
suite = context.add_expectation_suite("orders_suite")
# Add expectations
suite.add_expectation(
gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToNotBeNull(column="order_id")
)
suite.add_expectation(
gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToBeUnique(column="order_id")
)
# Validate
results = context.run_checkpoint(checkpoint_name="daily_orders")
```
## Detailed patterns and worked examples
Detailed pattern documentation lives in `references/details.md`. Read that file when the navigation tier above is insufficient.
## Summary: {total_passed}/{total_tables} tables passed")
report.append("")
for table, result in results.items():
status = "✅" if result.passed else "❌"
report.append(f"### {status} {table}")
report.append(f"- Expectations: {result.total_expectations}")
report.append(f"- Failed: {result.failed_expectations}")
if not result.passed:
report.append("- Failed checks:")
for detail in result.details:
if not detail["success"]:
report.append(f" - {detail['expectation']}: {detail['observed_value']}")
report.append("")
return "\n".join(report)
# Usage
context = gx.get_context()
pipeline = DataQualityPipeline(context)
tables_to_validate = {
"orders": "orders_suite",
"customers": "customers_suite",
"products": "products_suite",
}
results = pipeline.run_all(tables_to_validate)
report = pipeline.generate_report(results)
# Fail pipeline if any table failed
if not all(r.passed for r in results.values()):
print(report)
raise ValueError("Data quality checks failed!")
```
## Best Practices
### Do's
- **Test early** - Validate source data before transformations
- **Test incrementally** - Add tests as you find issues
- **Document expectations** - Clear descriptions for each test
- **Alert on failures** - Integrate with monitoring
- **Version contracts** - Track schema changes
### Don'ts
- **Don't test everything** - Focus on critical columns
- **Don't ignore warnings** - They often precede failures
- **Don't skip freshness** - Stale data is bad data
- **Don't hardcode thresholds** - Use dynamic baselines
- **Don't test in isolation** - Test relationships tooTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
CLAUDE.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
adb71e0b2512full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/wshobson__data-quality-frameworks.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | adb71e0b2512 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Data Quality Frameworks skill do?
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
Is Data Quality Frameworks safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Data Quality Frameworks access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (adb71e0b2512), read on 2026-09-30. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.