Competitive LandscapeSAFE
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
Overview
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
adb71e0b2512OBSERVED · 2026-09-30What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: competitive-landscape
description: Analyze competition, identify differentiation opportunities, and develop winning market positioning strategies using Porter's Five Forces, Blue Ocean Strategy, and positioning maps. Use this skill when evaluating competitors, assessing market positioning, identifying sustainable competitive advantages, or preparing competitive strategy analysis for a startup or investor pitch.
version: 1.0.0
---
# Competitive Landscape Analysis
Comprehensive frameworks for analyzing competition, identifying differentiation opportunities, and developing winning market positioning strategies.
## Overview
Understand competitive dynamics using proven frameworks (Porter's Five Forces, Blue Ocean Strategy, positioning maps) to identify opportunities and craft defensible competitive advantages.
## Porter's Five Forces
Analyze industry attractiveness and competitive intensity.
### Force 1: Threat of New Entrants
**Barriers to Entry:**
- Capital requirements
- Economies of scale
- Switching costs
- Brand loyalty
- Regulatory barriers
- Access to distribution
- Network effects
**High Threat:** Low barriers, easy to enter (e.g., simple SaaS tools)
**Low Threat:** High barriers (e.g., regulated industries, hardware)
**Analysis Questions:**
- How easy is it for new competitors to enter?
- What would it cost to launch a competing product?
- Are there network effects or switching costs protecting incumbents?
### Force 2: Bargaining Power of Suppliers
**Supplier Power Factors:**
- Supplier concentration
- Availability of substitutes
- Importance to supplier
- Switching costs
- Forward integration threat
**High Power:** Few suppliers, critical inputs (e.g., cloud infrastructure providers)
**Low Power:** Many alternatives, commoditized (e.g., generic services)
**Analysis Questions:**
- Who are our critical suppliers?
- Could they raise prices or reduce quality?
- Can we switch suppliers easily?
### Force 3: Bargaining Power of Buyers
**Buyer Power Factors:**
- Buyer concentration
- Volume purchased
- Product differentiation
- Price sensitivity
- Backward integration threat
**High Power:** Few large customers, standardized products (e.g., enterprise deals)
**Low Power:** Many small customers, differentiated product (e.g., consumer subscriptions)
**Analysis Questions:**
- Can customers easily switch to competitors?
- Do few customers generate most revenue?
- How price-sensitive are buyers?
### Force 4: Threat of Substitutes
**Substitute Considerations:**
- Alternative solutions
- Price-performance tradeoff
- Switching costs
- Buyer propensity to substitute
**High Threat:** Many alternatives, low switching cost (e.g., productivity software)
**Low Threat:** Unique solution, high switching cost (e.g., ERP systems)
**Analysis Questions:**
- What alternative ways can customers solve this problem?
- How do substitutes compare on price and performance?
- What's the cost to switch to a substitute?
### Force 5: Competitive Rivalry
**Rivalry Intensity Factors:**
- Number of competitors
- Industry growth rate
- Product differentiation
- Exit barriers
- Strategic stakes
**High Rivalry:** Many competitors, slow growth, commoditized (e.g., email marketing)
**Low Rivalry:** Few competitors, fast growth, differentiated (e.g., emerging AI tools)
**Analysis Questions:**
- How many direct competitors exist?
- Is the market growing or stagnant?
- How differentiated are offerings?
- Are competitors competing on price or value?
### Forces Analysis Summary
Create a scorecard:
| Force | Intensity (1-5) | Impact | Key Factors |
| -------------- | --------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- |
| New Entrants | 3 | Medium | Low barriers but network effects |
| Supplier Power | 2 | Low | Many cloud providers |
| Buyer Power | 4 | High | Enterprise customers concentrated |
| Substitutes | 3 | Medium | Manual processes alternative |
| Rivalry | 4 | High | 10+ direct competitors |
**Overall Assessment:** Moderate industry attractiveness with high rivalry and buyer power
## Blue Ocean Strategy
Identify uncontested market space through value innovation.
### Four Actions Framework
**Eliminate:**
What factors can be eliminated that the industry takes for granted?
**Reduce:**
What factors can be reduced well below industry standard?
**Raise:**
What factors can be raised well above industry standard?
**Create:**
What factors can be created that the industry never offered?
### Strategy Canvas
Map your offering vs. competitors on key factors.
**Example: Budget Hotels**
```
High | ★ Traditional Hotels
| ★ Budget Hotels (new)
|
Low |___________________________________
Price Luxury Convenience Cleanliness
Budget Hotel Strategy:
- Eliminate: Luxury amenities, room service
- Reduce: Lobby size, staff
- Raise: Cleanliness, online booking
- Create: Self-service kiosks, mobile app
```
### Value Innovation
Find the sweet spot: Lower cost + higher value
**Steps:**
1. Map industry competing factors
2. Identify factors to eliminate/reduce (cost savings)
3. Identify factors to raise/create (differentiation)
4. Validate that combination creates new market space
## Competitive Positioning
### Positioning Map
Plot competitors on 2-3 key dimensions.
**Example Dimensions:**
- Price vs. Features
- Complexity vs. Ease of Use
- Enterprise vs. SMB Focus
- Self-Service vs. High-Touch
- Generalist vs. Specialist
**How to Create:**
1. Choose 2 dimensions most important to customers
2. Plot all competitors
3. Identify gaps (white space)
4. Validate gap represents real customer need
**Example:**
```
High Price
|
| ★ Enterprise A ★ Enterprise B
|
| ● Our Position (gap)
|
| ★ Competitor C ★ Competitor D
|
Low Price |______Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (1)
CLAUDE.md
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
adb71e0b2512full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/wshobson__competitive-landscape.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-30 | adb71e0b2512 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Competitive Landscape skill do?
Multi-harness agentic plugin marketplace for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, GitHub Copilot, Google Antigravity, and Pi
Is Competitive Landscape safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Competitive Landscape access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (adb71e0b2512), read on 2026-09-30. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.