Agent skill · Audited from source
Thesis Compile Review
skill · WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skillsLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 81994516a430
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 81994516a430 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Thesis Compile Review (WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/willoscar/thesis-compile-review
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | WARN | 2 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass, no license.
Findings (2)
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .claude/skills
.claude/skills
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWInventory / provenanceinv.no_license
- Why
- no LICENSE file and no repo licence
- Fix
- add a licence
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 81994516a430 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherWILLOSCAR GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/.codex/skills/thesis-compile-reviewThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict81994516a430A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 9 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: 对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。
--- name: thesis-compile-review binding: staged description: "对中文毕业论文进行编译、warning 分级、模板模式检查、数据与引用复查,并把问题回写成可继续迭代的 review checklist。" --- # Thesis Compile Review ## Triggers & routing - **Trigger**: 毕业论文编译检查, thesis compile review, warning 分级, 终稿复查, main.pdf 检查. - **Use when**: 论文已经回写到 TeX 交付层,需要确认是否真正达到“可提交”的质量,而不是只做到能编译。 - **Skip if**: 还处于中间层重构阶段,`chapters/*.tex` 尚未形成稳定交付稿。 - **Network**: none. - **Guardrail**: 不在这里重构章节主线;如果发现结构问题,明确回退到上游修复。 ## Inputs - 完整 TeX 工程 - `main.tex` - 非正文同步版本 - `references/*.bib` - `claude_md/review_checklist.md` ## Outputs - `output/THESIS_BUILD_REPORT.md` - 更新后的 `claude_md/review_checklist.md` ## Load Order Always read: - `references/overview.md` - `references/warning_triage.md` Machine-readable contract: - `assets/build_review_contract.json` ## Workflow 1. 编译 `main.tex` 2. 分级处理 warning 3. 检查模板参数与交付模式 4. 检查关键数字、术语、引用与摘要一致性 5. 把问题写回 checklist 与 build report ## Key Rule “能编译”只是最低标准。 真正的目标是形成: - 可追溯的问题列表 - 可分级的 warning 处理结果 - 明确的回退层级(回 Markdown / 回 TeX / 回引用 / 回图表)
Excerpt, first 1,026 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 8199451
git clone https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills git -C research-units-pipeline-skills checkout 81994516a430
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 81994516a430 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
81994516a430
Similar skills
All automation skills →WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Compile the Beamer tutorial deck and write a build report.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Generate a Beamer slide deck from the final tutorial and approved module structure.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Build a retrieval-informed chapter skeleton (`outline/chapter_skeleton.yml`) from taxonomy/core scope before stable H3 decomposition.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Score an existing reader-facing deliverable and emit a deterministic PASS/FAIL scorecard plus bounded repair plan; use after synthesis, not to rewrite content.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Review and record one pending human checkpoint in a research Workspace; use when a HUMAN Unit is blocked on an `Approve C*` decision, and never treat silence or artifact existence as approval.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Lock an ideation run into a single-source-of-truth brainstorm brief (`output/trace/IDEA_BRIEF.md`) and a replayable multi-query plan (`queries.md`).
Questions about Thesis Compile Review
What does the Thesis Compile Review skill do?
Is Thesis Compile Review safe to install?
What can Thesis Compile Review access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.c — the audited source at commit 81994516a430 and every finding aboveObserved · 14 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Thesis Compile Review skill do?
- Is Thesis Compile Review safe to install?
- What can Thesis Compile Review access on my machine?