Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Thesis Citation Enhance Review

skill · WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skillsLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 81994516a430

★ 514pushed 9 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 8199451
514repo stars · whole WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 81994516a430 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 为中文毕业论文补强并核验引用:找出必须有引文支撑的句子,扩展候选文献,检查引用与论断是否匹配,并回写参考文献与正文引用。

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Thesis Citation Enhance Review (WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/willoscar/thesis-citation-enhance-review

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high1 medium1 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityWARN2
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codeNA0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass, no license.

Findings (2)

LOWInventory / provenanceinv.no_license
F-13 Inventory / provenanceCWE-1104Layer L0
Why
no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix
add a licence

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 81994516a430 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherWILLOSCAR GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/.codex/skills/thesis-citation-enhance-reviewThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict81994516a430A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 9 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: 为中文毕业论文补强并核验引用:找出必须有引文支撑的句子,扩展候选文献,检查引用与论断是否匹配,并回写参考文献与正文引用。

---
name: thesis-citation-enhance-review
binding: staged
description: "为中文毕业论文补强并核验引用:找出必须有引文支撑的句子,扩展候选文献,检查引用与论断是否匹配,并回写参考文献与正文引用。"
---

# Thesis Citation Enhance Review

## Triggers & routing

- **Trigger**: 引用补强, citation enhance, 文献补充, 引用核验, 毕业论文参考文献检查.
- **Use when**: 正文已有一定稳定度,需要系统补足背景、定义、对照工作和关键结论的引用支撑,并检查是否存在误引或漏引。
- **Skip if**: 还没有稳定正文,或当前仅在做早期结构重构。
- **Network**: optional.
- **Guardrail**: 不为了堆引用而堆引用;引用必须与论断匹配;先补对,再补多。


## Inputs

- 当前 Markdown / TeX 版本
- `references/*.bib`
- 现有 PDF / 参考工作

## Outputs

- 增强后的引用清单
- 引用核验记录

## Load Order

Always read:

- `references/overview.md`
- `references/citation_priority.md`
- `references/review_rules.md`

Machine-readable contract:

- `assets/citation_enhance_contract.json`

## Workflow

1. 找出必须有引文支撑的句子
2. 扩展候选文献
3. 检查引用是否和论断匹配
4. 回写 `bib` 与正文引用

Excerpt, first 807 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 8199451

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
git -C research-units-pipeline-skills checkout 81994516a430

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 81994516a430 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 81994516a430

Questions about Thesis Citation Enhance Review

What does the Thesis Citation Enhance Review skill do?
Research pipelines as semantic execution units: each skill declares inputs/outputs, acceptance criteria, and guardrails. Evidence-first methodology prevents hollow writing through structured intermediate artifacts.
Is Thesis Citation Enhance Review safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Thesis Citation Enhance Review access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (81994516a430), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.