Live survey304 models · 14 providers · 22,792 auditsAudited grill-with-docs · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Agent skill · Audited from source

Source Tutorial Writer

skill · WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skillsLicence not declaredAudited 14 Oct 2026 · source 81994516a430

★ 514pushed 9 days ago
✓SAFEGrade B · 89/100 · 14 Oct 2026 · 8199451
514repo stars · whole WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills

Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 81994516a430 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Use when approved tutorial context packs exist and the run needs the final article-first tutorial deliverable.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Source Tutorial Writer (WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills)”. Retrieved 14 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/willoscar/source-tutorial-writer

Trust audit

Audit 0.4.1 · source read 14 Oct 2026

Trust score89/100✓SAFE B
0 critical0 high1 medium1 low0 info

SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.

What the source does

  • FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
  • NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
  • ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
  • DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
  • SecretsNone foundNo keys in source

Five audit layers

LayerWhat we checkResultFindings
L0 ProvenanceRepo owner, licence, archive status, activityWARN2
L1 Static sourceSecrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden codePASS0
L2 InstructionsPrompt injection, authority framing, hidden directivesPASS0
L3 InventoryThe files and declarations match the sourcePASS0
L4 SandboxRun in isolation and watch behaviourSKIPPED why0

Gates applied: no behavioural pass, no license.

Findings (2)

LOWInventory / provenanceinv.no_license
F-13 Inventory / provenanceCWE-1104Layer L0
Why
no LICENSE file and no repo licence
Fix
add a licence

Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 81994516a430 · 14 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan

Provenance

Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to

  • PublisherWILLOSCAR GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
  • Source folderWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/.codex/skills/source-tutorial-writerThe exact folder we audited
  • LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
  • Commit pinned for this verdict81994516a430A new audit runs when the source changes
  • Repository statusNot archivedLast push 9 days ago
  • Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped

What it tells the agent

Full source on GitHub ↗

Its description: Use when approved tutorial context packs exist and the run needs the final article-first tutorial deliverable.

---
name: source-tutorial-writer
description: "Use when approved tutorial context packs exist and the run needs the final article-first tutorial deliverable."
---

# Source Tutorial Writer

## Triggers & routing

- **Trigger**: source tutorial writer, tutorial drafting, 教程正文, 从资料写教程.
- **Use when**: `source-tutorial` 的 C3,`outline/tutorial_context_packs.jsonl` 已就绪,且 `DECISIONS.md` 已勾选 `Approve C2`。
- **Skip if**: C2 未批准,或 context packs 还没准备好。
- **Network**: none.
- **Guardrail**: 正文必须 reader-first,但不能写出 sources 没支持的内容。


Writes the final tutorial markdown from approved module packs and the locked C2 structure.

## Inputs

- `outline/tutorial_context_packs.jsonl`
- `outline/module_plan.yml`
- `DECISIONS.md`

## Output

- `output/TUTORIAL.md`

## Contract

The tutorial must:
- start with reader orientation
- follow the approved module order
- keep per-module teaching sections explicit
- keep source notes visible but lightweight

Per module, the writer should emit:
- `### Why it matters`
- `### Key idea`
- `### Worked example`
- `### Check yourself`
- `### Source notes`

## Script boundary

`scripts/run.py` should:
- block on missing `Approve C2`
- load module packs in approved order
- render the deterministic tutorial scaffold/content into `output/TUTORIAL.md`

Keep rendering and pack interpretation in shared tutorial tooling, not in the wrapper.

## Acceptance

- `output/TUTORIAL.md` exists
- the required reader-orientation sections exist
- every module includes the required teaching subsections

## Non-goals

- self-loop QA reporting
- article/slides compilation

Excerpt, first 1,588 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.

Install

Pinned to the audited commit 8199451

Download folder ↗
git clone https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
git -C research-units-pipeline-skills checkout 81994516a430

The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 81994516a430 only.

Works in

The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.

Audit history

Every audit, every source change

  1. ✓SAFE B 89 / 100

    first audit · source 81994516a430

Questions about Source Tutorial Writer

What does the Source Tutorial Writer skill do?
Research pipelines as semantic execution units: each skill declares inputs/outputs, acceptance criteria, and guardrails. Evidence-first methodology prevents hollow writing through structured intermediate artifacts.
Is Source Tutorial Writer safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Source Tutorial Writer access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (81994516a430), read on 2026-10-14. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Sources

Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.