Agent skill · Audited from source
Bias Assessor
skill · WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skillsLicence not declaredAudited 19 Oct 2026 · source 81994516a430
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 81994516a430 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: Use when `evidence-review` has an extraction table and needs lightweight risk-of-bias fields.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Bias Assessor (WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills)”. Retrieved 19 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/willoscar/bias-assessor
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 19 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | WARN | 2 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | PASS | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | PASS | 0 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass, no license.
Findings (2)
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceinv.symlink · .claude/skills
.claude/skills
- Why
- link not followed
- Fix
- —
LOWInventory / provenanceinv.no_license
- Why
- no LICENSE file and no repo licence
- Fix
- add a licence
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 81994516a430 · 19 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- PublisherWILLOSCAR GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source folderWILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/.codex/skills/bias-assessorThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceNot declaredAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict81994516a430A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 14 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗Its description: Use when `evidence-review` has an extraction table and needs lightweight risk-of-bias fields.
--- name: bias-assessor description: "Use when `evidence-review` has an extraction table and needs lightweight risk-of-bias fields." --- # Bias Assessor ## Triggers & routing - **Trigger**: bias, risk-of-bias, RoB, evidence quality, 偏倚评估, 证据质量. - **Use when**: `evidence-review` 已生成 `papers/extraction_table.csv`,需要在 synthesis 前补齐偏倚/质量字段。 - **Skip if**: 不是 evidence/systematic review,或还没有 `papers/extraction_table.csv`。 - **Network**: none. - **Guardrail**: 使用简单可复核刻度(low/unclear/high)+ 简短 notes;保持字段一致性。 Enriches the extraction table with lightweight risk-of-bias fields for `evidence-review`. ## Input - `papers/extraction_table.csv` ## Output - updated `papers/extraction_table.csv` ## Contract The table should expose stable RoB columns: - `rob_selection` - `rob_measurement` - `rob_confounding` - `rob_reporting` - `rob_overall` - `rob_notes` Allowed values are fixed: - `low` - `unclear` - `high` ## Script boundary `scripts/run.py` should: - add missing RoB columns - assign a conservative overall score - keep notes brief ## Acceptance - RoB columns exist - all included rows have values - values stay within the fixed scale ## Non-goals - deep methodological critique - rewriting extraction contents
Excerpt, first 1,226 characters of SKILL.md, verbatim from the audited commit. It is text from someone else’s repository, quoted so you can judge it before your agent reads it.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 8199451
git clone https://github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills git -C research-units-pipeline-skills checkout 81994516a430
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 81994516a430 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
81994516a430
Similar skills
All automation skills →WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Compile the Beamer tutorial deck and write a build report.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Generate a Beamer slide deck from the final tutorial and approved module structure.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Build a retrieval-informed chapter skeleton (`outline/chapter_skeleton.yml`) from taxonomy/core scope before stable H3 decomposition.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Score an existing reader-facing deliverable and emit a deterministic PASS/FAIL scorecard plus bounded repair plan; use after synthesis, not to rewrite content.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Review and record one pending human checkpoint in a research Workspace; use when a HUMAN Unit is blocked on an `Approve C*` decision, and never treat silence or artifact existence as approval.
WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills
Lock an ideation run into a single-source-of-truth brainstorm brief (`output/trace/IDEA_BRIEF.md`) and a replayable multi-query plan (`queries.md`).
Questions about Bias Assessor
What does the Bias Assessor skill do?
Is Bias Assessor safe to install?
What can Bias Assessor access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/WILLOSCAR/research-units-pipeline-skills/tree/main/.c — the audited source at commit 81994516a430 and every finding aboveObserved · 19 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Bias Assessor skill do?
- Is Bias Assessor safe to install?
- What can Bias Assessor access on my machine?