Sarif ParsingSAFE

Vigolium - High-fidelity vulnerability scanner fusing agentic AI with native speed, modularity, and precision

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: sarif-parsing
description: >-
  Parses and processes SARIF files from static analysis tools like CodeQL, Semgrep, or other
  scanners. Triggers on "parse sarif", "read scan results", "aggregate findings", "deduplicate
  alerts", or "process sarif output". Handles filtering, deduplication, format conversion, and
  CI/CD integration of SARIF data. Does NOT run scans — use the Semgrep or CodeQL skills for that.
allowed-tools:
  - Bash
  - Read
  - Glob
  - Grep
---

# SARIF Parsing Best Practices

You are a SARIF parsing expert. Your role is to help users effectively read, analyze, and process SARIF files from static analysis tools.

## When to Use

Use this skill when:
- Reading or interpreting static analysis scan results in SARIF format
- Aggregating findings from multiple security tools
- Deduplicating or filtering security alerts
- Extracting specific vulnerabilities from SARIF files
- Integrating SARIF data into CI/CD pipelines
- Converting SARIF output to other formats

## When NOT to Use

Do NOT use this skill for:
- Running static analysis scans (use CodeQL or Semgrep skills instead)
- Writing CodeQL or Semgrep rules (use their respective skills)
- Analyzing source code directly (SARIF is for processing existing scan results)
- Triaging findings without SARIF input (use variant-analysis or audit skills)

## SARIF Structure Overview

SARIF 2.1.0 is the current OASIS standard. Every SARIF file has this hierarchical structure:

```
sarifLog
├── version: "2.1.0"
├── $schema: (optional, enables IDE validation)
└── runs[] (array of analysis runs)
    ├── tool
    │   ├── driver
    │   │   ├── name (required)
    │   │   ├── version
    │   │   └── rules[] (rule definitions)
    │   └── extensions[] (plugins)
    ├── results[] (findings)
    │   ├── ruleId
    │   ├── level (error/warning/note)
    │   ├── message.text
    │   ├── locations[]
    │   │   └── physicalLocation
    │   │       ├── artifactLocation.uri
    │   │       └── region (startLine, startColumn, etc.)
    │   ├── fingerprints{}
    │   └── partialFingerprints{}
    └── artifacts[] (scanned files metadata)
```

### Why Fingerprinting Matters

Without stable fingerprints, you can't track findings across runs:

- **Baseline comparison**: "Is this a new finding or did we see it before?"
- **Regression detection**: "Did this PR introduce new vulnerabilities?"
- **Suppression**: "Ignore this known false positive in future runs"

Tools report different paths (`/path/to/project/` vs `/github/workspace/`), so path-based matching fails. Fingerprints hash the *content* (code snippet, rule ID, relative location) to create stable identifiers regardless of environment.

## Tool Selection Guide

| Use Case | Tool | Installation |
|----------|------|--------------|
| Quick CLI queries | jq | `brew install jq` / `apt install jq` |
| Python scripting (simple) | pysarif | `pip install pysarif` |
| Python scripting (advanced) | sarif-tools | `pip install sarif-tools` |
| .NET applications | SARIF SDK | NuGet package |
| JavaScript/Node.js | sarif-js | npm package |
| Go applications | garif | `go get github.com/chavacava/garif` |
| Validation | SARIF Validator | sarifweb.azurewebsites.net |

## Strategy 1: Quick Analysis with jq

For rapid exploration and one-off queries:

```bash
# Pretty print the file
jq '.' results.sarif

# Count total findings
jq '[.runs[].results[]] | length' results.sarif

# List all rule IDs triggered
jq '[.runs[].results[].ruleId] | unique' results.sarif

# Extract errors only
jq '.runs[].results[] | select(.level == "error")' results.sarif

# Get findings with file locations
jq '.runs[].results[] | {
  rule: .ruleId,
  message: .message.text,
  file: .locations[0].physicalLocation.artifactLocation.uri,
  line: .locations[0].physicalLocation.region.startLine
}' results.sarif

# Filter by severity and get count per rule
jq '[.runs[].results[] | select(.level == "error")] | group_by(.ruleId) | map({rule: .[0].ruleId, count: length})' results.sarif

# Extract findings for a specific file
jq --arg file "src/auth.py" '.runs[].results[] | select(.locations[].physicalLocation.artifactLocation.uri | contains($file))' results.sarif
```

## Strategy 2: Python with pysarif

For programmatic access with full object model:

```python
from pysarif import load_from_file, save_to_file

# Load SARIF file
sarif = load_from_file("results.sarif")

# Iterate through runs and results
for run in sarif.runs:
    tool_name = run.tool.driver.name
    print(f"Tool: {tool_name}")

    for result in run.results:
        print(f"  [{result.level}] {result.rule_id}: {result.message.text}")

        if result.locations:
            loc = result.locations[0].physical_location
            if loc and loc.artifact_location:
                print(f"    File: {loc.artifact_location.uri}")
                if loc.region:
                    print(f"    Line: {loc.region.start_line}")

# Save modified SARIF
save_to_file(sarif, "modified.sarif")
```

## Strategy 3: Python with sarif-tools

For aggregation, reporting, and CI/CD integration:

```python
from sarif import loader

# Load single file
sarif_data = loader.load_sarif_file("results.sarif")

# Or load multiple files
sarif_set = loader.load_sarif_files(["tool1.sarif", "tool2.sarif"])

# Get summary report
report = sarif_data.get_report()

# Get histogram by severity
errors = report.get_issue_type_histogram_for_severity("error")
warnings = report.get_issue_type_histogram_for_severity("warning")

# Filter results
high_severity = [r for r in sarif_data.get_results()
                 if r.get("level") == "error"]
```

**sarif-tools CLI commands:**

```bash
# Summary of findings
sarif summary results.sarif

# List all results with details
sarif ls results.sarif

# Get results by severity
sarif ls --level error results.sarif

# Diff two SARIF files (find new/fixed issues)
sarif diff baseline.sarif current.sarif

# Convert to other formats
sarif csv results.sarif > results.csv
sarif html result

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

What the source does

Filesystem

none-observed

Network

none-observed

Shell

none-observed

Dependencies

pinned

Secrets in source

none-found

Findings (1)

AGENTS.md

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.