Next Cache Components AdoptionSAFE
The React Framework
Overview
The React Framework
db90a0cf4f5cOBSERVED · 2026-10-20Install
Commands as the repository documents them. They are shown, not run.
npx skills add https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/skills/next-dev-loop
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: next-cache-components-adoption
description: >
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it
surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache
Components, flip the `cacheComponents` flag, work through a flood of
blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the
`cache-components-instant-false` codemod, or decide between opting routes out
with `export const instant = false` and fixing them in place.
---
# next-cache-components-adoption
Enable Cache Components on an app and walk it to a passing build. This skill sequences the work; per-error recipes live in the dev overlay fix cards and the build's terminal output. The [migrating to Cache Components guide](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/migrating-to-cache-components) is the canonical reference for the concepts and per-API recipes this skill applies — consult it whenever the skill steps reference a pattern (`"use cache"`, `cacheLife`, `<Suspense>` placement, etc.) and you want the full explanation.
## requires
- **App Router project.** Cache Components is an App Router feature; `cacheComponents: true` does nothing for `pages/` routes. If the project has a `pages/` or `src/pages/` tree but no `app/` or `src/app/` tree, stop and tell the user — Pages → App migration is its own project, not part of this skill. A hybrid app (both `pages/` and `app/`) is fine: the flag affects the `app/` routes; `pages/` routes are unaffected and don't need opt-outs.
- **A resolved app directory.** Locate `next.config.{js,ts,mjs,cjs}` first: that's the project root, and an agent invoked from a subdirectory would otherwise test for `app/` against the wrong `cwd` and find nothing. Look for `app/` and `src/app/` under it, and treat every command and glob in this skill as relative to whichever one exists. If both exist, Next.js builds `app/` and never looks at `src/app/`, so its routes are shadowed and unbuilt — tell the user that and ask which tree to migrate instead of picking one.
- **A runnable app.** The whole loop verifies against `next dev` and a browser, so the app has to boot. If it reads a database or required env at import (e.g. an `env.ts` that throws on a missing `DATABASE_URL`), confirm it actually starts — with the real environment, or local data you stand up — before step 1. Adoption can't be verified against an app that won't run.
- **Next.js 16.3 or later.** That release is where the pieces this skill relies on land: top-level `cacheComponents`, `export const instant`, the dev-overlay instant-navigation validation warnings, and the `cache-components-instant-false` codemod. If `next --version` reports below 16.3, upgrade first:
- `npx @next/codemod@latest upgrade latest` to apply the version-to-version codemods.
- Read the relevant [version upgrade guide](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/upgrading) (e.g. [Version 16](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/upgrading/version-16)) for what the codemod doesn't cover.
- **No incompatible config keys.** `cacheComponents: true` errors on any file that still exports `dynamic`, `revalidate`, or `fetchCache`. Inventory these exports before running the codemod, then follow the [migration guide's per-key sections](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/migrating-to-cache-components). The guide is the source of truth for translating each value. The `cache-components-instant-false` codemod does not remove these configs.
- **`experimental.dynamicIO` is fatal.** It was renamed to top-level `cacheComponents` and the old key now aborts before any build can run — remove it (or replace with `cacheComponents: true`) first. `experimental.useCache` is still accepted as a deprecated alias; redundant once `cacheComponents: true` is set, so remove it for clarity.
### notes
- **No passing baseline before the flag.** If the app already uses `"use cache"`, the pre-flag build errors with `please enable the feature flag cacheComponents`. Enabling the flag is the first thing you do (in Incremental, before the codemod; in Direct, before fixing routes) — not a thing to do _after_ getting a passing build. Note this in your starting summary so it doesn't read as a regression.
- **Existing caches can stay.** Follow the migration guide's [`fetch` and `unstable_cache` sections](https://nextjs.org/docs/app/guides/migrating-to-cache-components#fetch-cache-options). Do not rewrite them solely to enable Cache Components.
- **Offline docs.** Guide links have offline copies under `node_modules/next/dist/docs/` (bundled since Next.js 16.2), with the directory layout numbered for ordering (e.g. `node_modules/next/dist/docs/01-app/02-guides/migrating-to-cache-components.md`). If you can't predict the numbered prefix, `find node_modules/next/dist/docs -name '<slug>.md'` resolves it. The `/docs/messages/*` error pages are not bundled.
- **Older versions without bundled docs.** Suggest `npx @next/codemod@latest agents-md` to the user before starting: it downloads a version-matched copy to `.next-docs/` and writes an index into `AGENTS.md`. It touches files in their repo, so ask first and run it only if they want it.
## the shape of the work
There's one loop: walk the route tree top-down, one feature at a time, adopting each route against `next dev` + a browser. The build is a final check for each feature, not the working surface.
The choice in step 1 is whether to opt every route out of validation first or fix routes as you go. Either way the loop is the same:
- **With a quiet pre-step (Incremental).** Run the codemod, fix what it can't, and fully migrate routes that previously required static rendering. Other routes keep their opt-outs for follow-up PRs.
- **Without (Direct).** Enable `cacheComponents` and start the loop on whatever the build flags first. Same loop, but every fix sits on one branch until adoption is complete.
In both, the per-route success bar is the same: **dev loop reports no errors AND `next build` passes**. Check in with the useTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | WARN |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (6)
.claude/skills
readme.md
test/development/app-dir/hmr-symlink/app/symlink-chain/page.tsx
test/development/app-dir/hmr-symlink/app/symlink-link/page.tsx
test/e2e/app-dir/next-condition/fixtures/instrumentation/sym-linked-packages
npx skills add https://github.com/vercel/next.js/tree/canary/skills/next-dev-loop
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
db90a0cf4f5cfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/vercel__next-cache-components-adoption.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | db90a0cf4f5c | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the next-cache-components-adoption — vercel/next.js skill do?
The React Framework
Is next-cache-components-adoption — vercel/next.js safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can next-cache-components-adoption — vercel/next.js access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (db90a0cf4f5c), read on 2026-10-20. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/vercel/next-cache-components-adoption/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.