Agent skill · Audited from source
Thinking Leverage Points
skill · tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skillsMIT licenceAudited 31 Oct 2026 · source 9a5557e61022
Is it safe? Yes — SAFE, grade B (89/100). We read this skill's source at commit 9a5557e61022 and found no filesystem, network or shell access and no hard-coded secrets. What it does: 28 eval-informed mental models and critical-thinking skills for Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Cursor, and other Agent Skills-compatible tools
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Thinking Leverage Points (tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills)”. Retrieved 31 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-leverage-points
Trust audit
Audit 0.4.1 · source read 31 Oct 2026
SAFE means nothing in the source contradicts what the skill says it does. Grade B is shared by 16,667 of 17,602 audited skills.
What the source does
- FilesystemNone observedNo reads or writes in the source
- NetworkNone observedNo outbound calls in the source
- ShellNone observedNo commands run in the source
- DependenciesPinnedNothing floats
- SecretsNone foundNo keys in source
Five audit layers
| Layer | What we check | Result | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|
L0 Provenance | Repo owner, licence, archive status, activity | PASS | 0 |
L1 Static source | Secrets, path traversal, supply chain, hidden code | NA | 0 |
L2 Instructions | Prompt injection, authority framing, hidden directives | PASS | 0 |
L3 Inventory | The files and declarations match the source | WARN | 1 |
L4 Sandbox | Run in isolation and watch behaviour | SKIPPED why | 0 |
Gates applied: no behavioural pass.
Findings (1)
MEDIUMInventory / provenanceskill.no_skill_md
- Why
- no SKILL.md at the audited path
- Fix
- a skill without its instruction file cannot be reviewed as one
Audit 0.4.1 · source sha 9a5557e61022 · 31 Oct 2026Report an issue or request a re-scan
Provenance
Who published it, and what the verdict is pinned to
- Publishertjboudreaux GitHub userOwner of the repository this skill is read from
- Source foldertjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills/skills/thinking-leverage-pointsThe exact folder we audited
- LicenceMITAs the repository states it
- Commit pinned for this verdict9a5557e61022A new audit runs when the source changes
- Repository statusNot archivedLast push 84 days ago
- Sandboxed runNot runSkills are read, not executed; layer L4 is skipped
What it tells the agent
Full source on GitHub ↗We did not capture a SKILL.md for this skill, so there is no instruction text to quote here.
Install
Pinned to the audited commit 9a5557e
git clone https://github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills git -C cc-thinking-skills checkout 9a5557e61022
The author documents no install command, so this uses the repository directly. Our verdict covers commit 9a5557e61022 only.
Works in
The author has not said which agents this skill supports, and we have not tested it in any.
Audit history
Every audit, every source change
- ✓SAFE B 89 / 100
first audit · source
9a5557e61022
README badge
For maintainers · shows the latest audit
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-leverage-points/)
The badge shows our verdict and grade for this skill, and links back to this page. It changes when the audit does.
Similar skills
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
Use when a selective defect needs IS/IS-NOT difference analysis or a consequential option choice needs must/want weighting and adverse-consequence comparison.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
Use when longevity of a non-perishable option matters. Treat survival duration as a remaining-life prior, then check domain drift before favoring the proven.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
When a claim, doc, test, metric, or assumption conflicts with observed behavior, stop theorizing from the map and verify the live code or data; let territory overrule.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
When provisioning, setting a limit, or committing an estimate under uncertainty, size a buffer to residual error and the cost of breach—not to the optimistic edge.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
When one mental model leaves a material blind spot on a multi-domain or high-stakes problem, sequence complementary models with named roles and a conflict rule.
tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills
Deciding what to build or why adoption fails. Recover the progress users hire a solution for under a circumstance, then rank by outcome and competing workarounds.
Add this badge to your README
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-leverage-points/)
<a href="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-leverage-points/"><img src="https://modelsatlas.com/skills/tjboudreaux/thinking-leverage-points/badge.svg" alt="ModelsAtlas: SAFE B"></a>
Questions about Thinking Leverage Points
What does the Thinking Leverage Points skill do?
Is Thinking Leverage Points safe to install?
What can Thinking Leverage Points access on my machine?
How current is this page?
Sources
- github.com/tjboudreaux/cc-thinking-skills/tree/main/skills/think — the audited source at commit 9a5557e61022 and every finding aboveObserved · 31 Oct 2026
Spotted something wrong? Report a correction · Methodology
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- What does the Thinking Leverage Points skill do?
- Is Thinking Leverage Points safe to install?
- What can Thinking Leverage Points access on my machine?